Judge: Margaret L. Oldendorf, Case: 18BBCV00147, Date: 2023-03-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 18BBCV00147 Hearing Date: March 28, 2023 Dept: P
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
NORTHEAST DISTRICT
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff
Intermedia Film Distribution, Ltd. (Intermedia) filed this action against NBC
Universal Media, LLC alleging breach of contract and related claims. The First
Amended Complaint adds allegations of fraud and related claims against LEI
Development Projects, Inc. (LEI) and its principal Christopher Taylor (Taylor).
LEI and Taylor filed a motion to compel arbitration as to Intermedia, which was
granted.
Arbitration took place in May 2022. The arbitrator was
Bruce Isaacs of Signature Resolution. The arbitrator issued a final written
arbitration award on September 8, 2022, serving it September 9, 2022. On
September 20, 2022, Intermedia filed a Petition to Confirm the award.
LEI/Taylor failed to timely file opposition.
On November 4, 2022, the Court heard and granted
Intermedia’s petition to confirm the award. On December 23, 2022, the Court
entered judgment on the award.
The arbitration award includes an award of fees and costs
to Intermedia as the prevailing party pursuant to a contract provision.
Intermedia now seeks a further fee and cost award for fees and costs incurred
since the award issued. The motion is granted.
II. LEGAL
STANDARD
Civ. Code §1717(a)
In any action on a contract, where the contract
specifically provides that attorney's fees and costs, which are incurred to
enforce that contract, shall be awarded either to one of the parties or to the
prevailing party, then the party who is determined to be the party prevailing
on the contract, whether he or she is the party specified in the contract or
not, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees in addition to other
costs.
Where a contract provides for attorney’s fees, as set
forth above, that provision shall be construed as applying to the entire
contract, unless each party was represented by counsel in the negotiation and
execution of the contract, and the fact of that representation is specified in
the contract.
Reasonable attorney’s fees shall be fixed by the court,
and shall be an element of the costs of suit.
. . .
“Our
courts have consistently ‘distinguish[ed] between’ attorney’s fees that are
sought as ‘the allowance ... to the prevailing party as an incident to the
principal cause of action,’ and those that are sought as ‘part of the cause of
action.’ (Mabee v. Nurseryland Garden Centers, Inc. (1979) 88 Cal.App.3d
420, 425, 152 Cal.Rptr. 31 (Mabee), superseded by statute on another
ground as stated in Santisas, supra, 17 Cal.4th at p. 629, 71
Cal.Rptr.2d 830, 951 P.2d 399.) When sought by the ‘prevailing party ... as an
incident to the judgment’ (ibid.), attorney's fees may be ‘properly
awarded [as a form of cost] after entry of a ... judgment.’ (Khavarian
Enterprises, Inc. v. Commline, Inc. (2013) 216 Cal.App.4th 310, 326, 156
Cal.Rptr.3d 657 (Khavarian ).) However, when ‘fees are part of the relief
sought [,they] must be pleaded and proved at trial.’ (Id. at p. 327, 156
Cal.Rptr.3d 657.)” Monster, LLC v. Superior Court (2017) 12 Cal.App.5th
1214, 1228.
III. DISCUSSION
The written agreement on which this litigation is based contains
an attorney fee provision. A copy of the agreement is attached as Exhibit A to
the Declaration of Jeremiah Reynolds. Here is what the contract provides:
11.3
Attorneys’ Fees. If Seller or Purchaser shall bring an action against the other
by reason of any alleged breach of any covenant, provision or condition hereof,
or otherwise arising out of this Agreement, the unsuccessful party shall pay to
the prevailing party all attorneys’ fees and costs actually incurred by the
prevailing party, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.
As used in this Section 11.3 and elsewhere in this Agreement, “actual attorneys’
fees” or “attorneys’ fees actually incurred" means the full and actual
cost of any legal services actually performed in connection with the matter for
which such fees are sought calculated on the basis of the usual fees charged by
the attorneys performing such services, and shall not be limited to “reasonable
attorneys’ fees” as that term may be defined in statutory or decisional
authority.
The arbitrator interpreted this to be a broad attorney
fee provision and awarded Intermedia its fees in the full amount requested:
$247,056.50. Exhibit B to Reynolds Declaration. The arbitration award also
gives Intermedia its costs in full: $117,018.50.
Intermedia now seeks to recover an additional $37,350 in
fees and $4,715.20 in costs. These fees and costs are well supported by the
Reynolds Declaration. LEI and Taylor were provided with notice of this motion
and have not opposed it. Because the contract provides for such recovery and
based on the Court’s independent review of the fees and costs requested (discussed
below), the motion is granted.
The evidence is that Reynolds spent 24 hours on this
litigation from September 2022 through January 2023; at his hourly rate of $760
that is $18,240. Reynolds states that attorney Katie Pierucci spent 36.75 hours
on this litigation for this same period; at her hourly rate of $520 her
lodestar amount is $19,110. The combined lodestar amount is $37.350. Information
is provided to support the hourly rates of each attorney. Reynolds Declaration,
¶¶12 and 14. The Court finds these rates to be reasonable for attorneys of
similar experience in the Los Angeles marketplace. The billing records at
Exhibit D to the Reynolds Declaration describe in adequate detail the tasks
performed. The fees requested are awarded in full.
The cost bill is at Exhibit C. The itemized amounts
include $695.70 for motion fees, $3,775 for court reports fees, and $244.50 for
“Other.” This last amount, while unexplained, is supported by the verified cost
bill and by the supporting declaration.
IV. ORDER
Intermedia’s motion for fees and costs is granted in the
amount requested. Intermedia is ordered
to give notice.
Dated: _______________________________
MARGARET L. OLDENDORF
JUDGE
OF THE SUPERIOR COURT