Judge: Mark A. Young, Case: 22SMCV00518, Date: 2023-05-23 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22SMCV00518 Hearing Date: May 23, 2023 Dept: M
CASE NAME: Thompson v. Wrapedia
Inc., et al.
CASE NO.: 22SMCV00518
MOTION: Motion
to be Relieved as Counsel for Wrapedia
HEARING DATE: 5/23/2023
Legal
Standard
The
court may order that an attorney be changed or substituted at any time before
or after judgment or final determination upon request by either client or
attorney and after notice from one to the other. (CCP §
284(2).) The attorney seeking to withdraw must take “reasonable steps to
avoid reasonably foreseeable prejudice to the rights of the client, including
giving due notice to the client, allowing time for employment of other
counsel.” (Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct, 3-700(A)(2). See, e.g., Vann v. Shilleh
(1975) [holding withdrawal prejudicial where attorney withdraw from the
representation of defendant on the Friday before trial began the following
Monday].) “The determination whether to grant or deny a motion to withdraw as
counsel lies within the sound discretion of the trial court.” (Manfredi & Levine v. Superior Court
(1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1133.)
An
application to be relieved as counsel must be made on Judicial Counsel Form
MC-051 (Notice of Motion and Motion), MC-052 (Declaration), and MC-053
(Proposed Order). (CRC 3.1362(a), (c), (e).) The
requisite forms must be served “on the client and on all parties that have
appeared in the case.” (CRC, 3.1362(d).)
When a client is served by mail, the attorney’s declaration must indicate that
the client’s address was confirmed within the last 30 days and how it was
confirmed. (Id.) If the attorney is
unable to confirm the client’s current address, the declaration must state the
reasonable efforts made within the last 30 days to obtain the client’s current
address. (Id.)
Additionally,
the declaration “must state in general terms and without compromising the
confidentiality of the attorney client relationship why” a motion is brought
instead of filing a substitution of attorney. (CRC, 3.1362(c).)
Analysis
Counsel Guy E. Jamison, Esq. moves to
be relieved as counsel of record for Defendant Wrapedia, Inc. Counsel submits all
the mandatory forms. Counsel states that an irreparable breakdown of the
attorney-client relationship has occurred because of difficulty
communicating with the client. According
to Counsel, the client continually ignores email communications and will not
respond timely to matters pertaining to the lawsuit. Further, Client has not
paid invoices for services rendered since July of 2022 and refuses to
communicate regarding the same. As such, there is a serious breakdown in the
attorney client relationship that prevents Counsel from effectively and
zealously representing client's interest. Counsel
served his client by mail at his last known address, which was confirmed within
the past 30 days by observing that the client still conducts business at the
premises, and via the company’s internet presence. There are no future hearings
yet set on this matter. The Court finds that the client would not be prejudiced
by withdrawal, since there is no trial or dispositive motions set.
Accordingly,
the motion is GRANTED. The order is effective upon the filing of the proof of
service of the order on the client. Until then, counsel remains counsel of
record.