Judge: Mark A. Young, Case: 22SMCV00943, Date: 2022-09-21 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22SMCV00943    Hearing Date: September 21, 2022    Dept: M

CASE NAME:           De 8484 Wilshire LLC, et al., v. Pacific Holdings, et al.

CASE NO.:                22SMCV00943

MOTION:                  Motion to be Relieved as Counsel

HEARING DATE:   9/21/2022

Legal Standard

The court may order that an attorney be changed or substituted at any time before or after judgment or final determination upon request by either client or attorney and after notice from one to the other. (CCP § 284(2).) The attorney seeking to withdraw must take “reasonable steps to avoid reasonably foreseeable prejudice to the rights of the client, including giving due notice to the client, allowing time for employment of other counsel.” (Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct, 3-700(A)(2). See, e.g., Vann v. Shilleh (1975) [holding withdrawal prejudicial where attorney withdraw from the representation of defendant on the Friday before trial began the following Monday].) “The determination whether to grant or deny a motion to withdraw as counsel lies within the sound discretion of the trial court.” (Manfredi & Levine v. Superior Court (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1133.) 

An application to be relieved as counsel must be made on Judicial Counsel Form MC-051 (Notice of Motion and Motion), MC-052 (Declaration), and MC-053 (Proposed Order). (CRC 3.1362(a), (c), (e).) The requisite forms must be served “on the client and on all parties that have appeared in the case.” (CRC, 3.1362(d).) When a client is served by mail, the attorney’s declaration must indicate that the client’s address was confirmed within the last 30 days and how it was confirmed. (Id.) If the attorney is unable to confirm the client’s current address, the declaration must state the reasonable efforts made within the last 30 days to obtain the client’s current address. (Id.)

Additionally, the declaration “must state in general terms and without compromising the confidentiality of the attorney client relationship why” a motion is brought instead of filing a substitution of attorney. (CRC, 3.1362(c).)

Analysis

Counsel Vadim F. Frish’s motion to be relieved as counsel for Defendant Pacific Holdings, a General Partnership is GRANTED. The order is effective upon the filing of the proof of service of the order on the client. Until then, counsel remains counsel of record. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

The Court finds that all the mandatory forms present. Counsel states that an irreparable breakdown of the attorney-client relationship has occurred. Counsel served his client by mail at his last known address, which was confirmed within the past 30 days by mail.

The Court notes that the MC-053 should include notice of the December 20, 2022, CMC hearing date.

Given that this case is still in earlier stages, the Court does not find that withdrawal will prejudice the client.