Judge: Mark A. Young, Case: 22SMCV01806, Date: 2024-04-02 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22SMCV01806    Hearing Date: April 2, 2024    Dept: M

CASE NAME:           Johnson, v. Bird

CASE NO.:                22SMCV01806

MOTION:                  Motion to Compel Compliance with SDT

HEARING DATE:   4/2/2024

 

Legal Standard

 

            Personal service of a deposition subpoena obligates the production of whatever documents or things are specified in the subpoena and to appear in any proceedings to enforce discovery. (CCP § 2020.220(c). If a nonparty disobeys a deposition subpoena, the subpoenaing party may seek a court order pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1987.1 compelling the nonparty to comply with the subpoena within 60 days after completion of the deposition record. (CCP § 2025.480(b); see also UnzippedApparel, LLC v. Bader (2007) 156 Cal.App.4th 123, 127.) The motion must be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration. (CCP § 2025.480(b).) There is no “good cause” requirement when seeking to compel documents from a nonparty. (CCP § 2020.410(c).) Where personal records of a “consumer” (CCP § 1985.3) or an employee's employment records (CCP § 1985.6) are subpoenaed, the records turnover cannot take place until at least 20 days after the subpoena is “issued.” (CCP § 2025.270(c).)

 

Analysis

 

Defendant Christopher Scott Bird moves to compel the deposition of the person most knowledgeable at non-party United Parcel Services, Inc. (UPS). Defendant requests sanctions against UPS and/or the PMK at UPS, jointly and severally, in the amount of $1,262.93 plus an additional monetary sanction of $500.00 under Code of Civil Procedure section 1992.

 

            Defendant seeks the deposition of the PMK at UPS because Plaintiff has represented that she was working for UPS, located at 10690 Santa Monica Boulevard 90025, at the time of the alleged dog bite incident, as a Cover Package Driver. Plaintiff also claims to have a total loss of income claim of no less than $270,000.00. (Bandhold Decl., ¶ 4; Exs. A, B.) According to Defendant, UPS’s PMK may have discoverable information on these subjects, including Plaintiff’s claimed loss of income. 

 

Defendant demonstrates that on January 22, 2024, Defendant’s counsel issued a remote deposition subpoena (via Zoom) to the PMK at UPS, with a deposition date of February 14, 2024. The deposition subpoena identified the subject matters of said deposition to include the incident of November 4, 2020, occurring while Plaintiff was performing her job duties, any and all personnel matters, employment matters, matters pertaining to employee job performance, any information regarding on the job injuries, and all payroll and attendance matters regarding Plaintiff. (Bandhold Decl., Ex. C.) On February 1, 2023, thirteen days prior to the scheduled deposition, the subpoena was personally served on the PMK at UPS, via Nicole Stauss, the registered agent authorized to accept service on behalf of the subpoenaed deposition witness. (Id., ¶ 7, Ex. E.) Prior to the deposition date, there was no objection to the deposition subpoena from UPS or Plaintiff. (¶ 8.) On February 14, 2024, at approximately 2:15 p.m. (15 minutes after the deposition was scheduled to proceed), a certificate of nonappearance at the scheduled deposition was taken for the subpoenaed deposition witness, the PMK at UPS. (Id., ¶ 9, Ex. F.) On February 21, 2024, Defendant sent correspondence to UPS, enclosing copies of the subject deposition subpoena for the PMK at UPS, requesting that UPS contact Defendant to reschedule the deposition. (Id., ¶ 10, Ex. G.) UPS has not contacted Defendant regarding the deposition. (¶ 11.)

 

Defendant meets his burden to show the personal service of the deposition subpoena, and UPS’s unexcused failure to produce the PMK as noticed. UPS and Plaintiff have not opposed this motion to compel. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED. UPS must produce its PMK to appear and testify at deposition within 20 days of this order pursuant to the subject deposition notice. Sanctions are imposed in the noticed amount of $1,762.93, inclusive of costs, against United Parcel Services, Inc., and in favor of defendant’s counsel of record. Sanctions are to be paid within 30 days.