Judge: Mark A. Young, Case: 23SMCV01431, Date: 2023-09-20 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 23SMCV01431    Hearing Date: September 21, 2023    Dept: M

CASE NAME:           Glatman, et al., v. Guido, et al.

CASE NO.:                23SMCV01431

MOTION:                  Motion to be Relieved as Counsel

HEARING DATE:   9/21/2023

Legal Standard

The court may order that an attorney be changed or substituted at any time before or after judgment or final determination upon request by either client or attorney and after notice from one to the other. (CCP § 284(2).) The attorney seeking to withdraw must take “reasonable steps to avoid reasonably foreseeable prejudice to the rights of the client, including giving due notice to the client, allowing time for employment of other counsel.” (Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct, 3-700(A)(2). See, e.g., Vann v. Shilleh (1975) [holding withdrawal prejudicial where attorney withdraw from the representation of defendant on the Friday before trial began the following Monday].) “The determination whether to grant or deny a motion to withdraw as counsel lies within the sound discretion of the trial court.” (Manfredi & Levine v. Superior Court (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1133.) 

An application to be relieved as counsel must be made on Judicial Counsel Form MC-051 (Notice of Motion and Motion), MC-052 (Declaration), and MC-053 (Proposed Order). (CRC 3.1362(a), (c), (e).) The requisite forms must be served “on the client and on all parties that have appeared in the case.” (CRC, 3.1362(d).) When a client is served by mail, the attorney’s declaration must indicate that the client’s address was confirmed within the last 30 days and how it was confirmed. (Id.) If the attorney is unable to confirm the client’s current address, the declaration must state the reasonable efforts made within the last 30 days to obtain the client’s current address. (Id.)

Additionally, the declaration “must state in general terms and without compromising the confidentiality of the attorney client relationship why” a motion is brought instead of filing a substitution of attorney. (CRC, 3.1362(c).)

Analysis

Counsel Tatiana Ingman moves to be relieved as counsel of record for Plaintiffs Bruce Glatman and Encore International LLC. Counsel provides all mandatory forms for relief. Counsel provides that Glatman, individually and as principal for Encore, has failed to respond to any attempts at communication. Following co-counsel’s death, Counsel has attempted to communicate with Glatman via telephone, email and text to no avail. Thus, the Court concludes that an irreparable breakdown of the attorney-client relationship has occurred.

Counsel has been unable to confirm Plaintiffs’ current address. Counsel made reasonable and good faith attempts to contact her clients regarding this motion. Counsel mailed the motion papers to the last known address, with return receipt requested, called the client’s last known telephone number, and contacted Glatman’s assistant, Vivian Ramos, who also did not respond.

The declaration notes the next hearing that on calendar.

As this action is still in its early stages, and no trial is set, the Court finds that the clients will not be prejudiced by the withdrawal. Accordingly, the motion is tentatively GRANTED. The order is effective upon the filing of the proof of service of the order on the client. Until then, counsel remains counsel of record.