Judge Mark A. Young, Case Number: 23SMCV04855, Date: 2024-09-03 Tentative Ruling

Judge: Mark A. Young, Case: 23SMCV04855, Date: 2024-09-03 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 23SMCV04855 Hearing Date: September 3, 2024 Dept: M

23SMCV04855

MOTION: Motion to be Relieved as Counsel

HEARING DATE: 9/3/2024

LEGAL STANDARD

The court may order that an attorney be changed or substituted at any time before or after judgment or final determination upon request by either client or attorney and after notice from one to the other. (CCP § 284(2).) The attorney seeking to withdraw must take “reasonable steps to avoid reasonably foreseeable prejudice to the rights of the client, including giving due notice to the client, allowing time for employment of other counsel.” (Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct, 3-700(A)(2). See, e.g., Vann v. Shilleh (1975) [holding withdrawal prejudicial where attorney withdraw from the representation of defendant on the Friday before trial began the following Monday].) “The determination whether to grant or deny a motion to withdraw as counsel lies within the sound discretion of the trial court.” (Manfredi & Levine v. Superior Court (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1133.)

An application to be relieved as counsel must be made on Judicial Counsel Form MC-051 (Notice of Motion and Motion), MC-052 (Declaration), and MC-053 (Proposed Order). (CRC 3.1362(a), (c), (e).) The requisite forms must be served “on the client and on all parties that have appeared in the case.” (CRC, 3.1362(d).) When a client is served by mail, the attorney’s declaration must indicate that the client’s address was confirmed within the last 30 days and how it was confirmed. (Id.) If the attorney is unable to confirm the client’s current address, the declaration must state the reasonable efforts made within the last 30 days to obtain the client’s current address. (Id.)

Additionally, the declaration “must state in general terms and without compromising the confidentiality of the attorney client relationship why” a motion is brought instead of filing a substitution of attorney. (CRC, 3.1362(c).)

ANALYSIS

Daniel A. De Soto and KJ Injury & Accident Lawyers PC move to be relieved as counsel of record for Plaintiff Ethan Arnold, by and through his GAL, Sandee Arnold.

Counsel submits all the mandatory forms. Counsel states that an irreparable breakdown of the attorney-client relationship has occurred. Counsel served the client by mail at their last known address, which was confirmed within the past 30 days via an online people search of the GAL. The declaration notes the hearings on calendar, including the FSC and trial date. Given that trial is not until March 19, 2025, the Court does not find that the client will be prejudiced by the withdrawal.

Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED. The order is effective upon the filing of the proof of service of the order on the client. Until then, counsel remains counsel of record. The Court also sets a status conference re retention of counsel for October 1, 2024, at 8:30 a.m.