Judge: Mark A. Young, Case: 23SMCV05750, Date: 2025-01-03 Tentative Ruling



Case Number: 23SMCV05750    Hearing Date: January 3, 2025    Dept: M

CASE NAME:           BMBG Investments, LLC v. Fuzion Force LA LLC, et al.

CASE NO.:                23SMCV05750

MOTION:                  Motion to be Relieved

HEARING DATE:   1/3/2025

 

LEGAL STANDARD

 

The court may order that an attorney be changed or substituted at any time before or after judgment or final determination upon request by either client or attorney and after notice from one to the other. (CCP § 284(2).) The attorney seeking to withdraw must take “reasonable steps to avoid reasonably foreseeable prejudice to the rights of the client, including giving due notice to the client, allowing time for employment of other counsel.” (Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct, 3-700(A)(2). See, e.g., Vann v. Shilleh (1975) [holding withdrawal prejudicial where attorney withdraw from the representation of defendant on the Friday before trial began the following Monday].) “The determination whether to grant or deny a motion to withdraw as counsel lies within the sound discretion of the trial court.” (Manfredi & Levine v. Superior Court (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1133.) 

 

An application to be relieved as counsel must be made on Judicial Counsel Form MC-051 (Notice of Motion and Motion), MC-052 (Declaration), and MC-053 (Proposed Order). (CRC 3.1362(a), (c), (e).) The requisite forms must be served “on the client and on all parties that have appeared in the case.” (CRC, 3.1362(d).) When a client is served by mail, the attorney’s declaration must indicate that the client’s address was confirmed within the last 30 days and how it was confirmed. (Id.) If the attorney is unable to confirm the client’s current address, the declaration must state the reasonable efforts made within the last 30 days to obtain the client’s current address. (Id.)

 

Additionally, the declaration “must state in general terms and without compromising the confidentiality of the attorney client relationship why” a motion is brought instead of filing a substitution of attorney. (CRC, 3.1362(c).)

 

ANALYSIS

 

Counsel David Tran moves to be relieved as counsel of record for Plaintiff BMBG Investments LLC. Counsel failed to submit the mandatory form, MC-052, although counsel did submit a declaration. (CRC Rule 3.1362(c).)

 

Otherwise, counsel states that an irreparable breakdown of the attorney-client relationship has occurred. Counsel served his client by mail at BMBG’s agent for service of process as stated in BMBG’s California Secretary of State, Statement of Information dated February 8, 2024, via mail with return receipt requested. The declaration and form notes the hearings that are on calendar. Given that trial is not set and default is entered against defendant, the Court does not find that the client will be prejudiced by the withdrawal.

 

Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED. The order is effective upon the filing of the proof of service of the order on the client. Until then, counsel remains counsel of record.