Judge: Mark C. Kim, Case: 19STCV02649, Date: 2023-01-05 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19STCV02649 Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Dept: S27
1. Motion
for Determination of Good Faith Settlement
Defendant, Rovar Properties, LLC
has agreed to settle all claims with Plaintiffs for the total amount of
$350,000 in exchange for Plaintiffs’ dismissal of all claims against it. Rovar seeks an order finding the settlement to
be in good faith.
Any opposition to the motion was
due on or before 12/21/22. Pursuant to
CCP §877.6(d), the burden of proof on a motion for determination of good faith
settlement is squarely on the party opposing the good faith finding. In the absence of opposition, and in light of
the burden of proof, the motion is granted.
2. Petitions
(2) for Approval of Minors’ Compromises
Plaintiffs, Oscar Jovani Miranda
and Valerian Miranda are minors, ages six and eleven respectively. They have agreed to a settlement of all
claims with Defendants, (a) 7 Star Logistics, Inc., Three Countries Logistics,
Inc., Jorge Cruz and Miguel Rodriguez ($600,000), (2) MSC Mediterranean Shipping
Co. S.A. ($100,000), (3) Rovar Properties, LLC ($75,000), (4) International
Cargo Equipment, Inc. ($25,000), and (5) Total Terminal International, LLC
($20,000). The amounts listed are the
amounts allocated to each of the two minor plaintiffs.
The settlement, if approved, after
costs and attorneys’ fees, would allocate a total of $1,009,480 to Karla
Miranda, $820,000 to each of the two minor plaintiffs, $71,380 to two of
Decedent’s adult children, and $46,380 to two other of Decedent’s adult
children. If the minors’ settlements are approved,
$328,000 from each settlement will be allocated to attorneys’ fees and
$102,730.22 to costs, including an insurance lien, with the remaining
$389,269.78 to be invested in a single-premium deferred annuity subject to
withdrawal only upon authorization of the court.
The Court finds the settlement fair
and reasonable. The Court also finds the
attorneys’ fees and costs fair and reasonable, in light of the extensive
litigation history and age of the case.
Pursuant to CRC 7.952, Petitioner
and the minor plaintiffs must appear and testify at the hearing unless they are
excused from doing so. The Court excuses
the minor plaintiffs from appearance due to their young age. The Court asks Petitioner and Counsel to appear
remotely at the hearing, and the Court will approve the settlement if it is
satisfied with Petitioner’s testimony at the hearing.
3. OSC
re: Dismissal (Settlement)
The parties are reminded that there
are OSCs re: dismissal due to settlement on calendar today. The Court asks Counsel to appear remotely at
the OSCs and hearing on the above matters.