Judge: Mark C. Kim, Case: 21LBCV00668, Date: 2023-03-30 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21LBCV00668 Hearing Date: March 30, 2023 Dept: S27
Plaintiffs, Anicia Maria Espinoza
Reyes and Benigno Enriquez Espinosa filed this action against Defendants, Ana
Canjura and Deysi Camarena for negligence, breach of warranty of habitability,
breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment, premises liability, nuisance, and
IIED.
Defendants noticed Plaintiff, Anicia
Maria Espinoza Reyes’s video deposition for 1/26/23, but Plaintiff failed to
appear. The parties met and conferred
and agreed that the deposition would go forward on 2/08/23. Defendants noticed the deposition for
2/08/23, but Plaintiff again failed to appear.
Defendants move to compel Plaintiff
to appear at a video deposition. The motion
to compel is granted. CCP
§2025.450(a). Defendants seek an order
requiring Plaintiff to appear for deposition within ten days; the Court finds
this timeline to be too tight to meaningfully meet and confer and schedule the
deposition. The Court orders Plaintiff
to meet and confer with Defendants concerning a deposition date and time within
the next five days. The deposition must
go forward at a mutually convenient date and time within the fifteen days
following the meet and confer conversation.
If Plaintiff does not initiate the meet and confer process within five
days, Defendants may unilaterally schedule the mandated deposition on statutory
notice for a date and time of their choosing.
Defendants also seek an order
imposing sanctions. Sanctions are
mandatory per §2025.450(c)(1) unless Plaintiff shows good cause to avoid a
sanctions order. Any opposition to the
motion was due on or before 3/17/23.
Plaintiff did not file timely opposition to the motion. In the absence of opposition, Plaintiff necessarily
did not meet her burden to show imposition of sanctions would not be just. Sanctions are therefore imposed. Defendants seek sanctions in the total amount
of $1590.60, which includes court reporter and translator fees for each of the
missed depositions. The Court has
reviewed Defendants’ attorney’s declaration in support of the request for
sanctions and finds the amount is reasonable and fully supported. Plaintiff is ordered to pay sanctions to
Defendants, by and through their attorney of record, in the amount of $1590.60,
within twenty days.
Defendants
are ordered to give notice.