Judge: Mark C. Kim, Case: 22LBCV00011, Date: 2022-08-23 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22LBCV00011 Hearing Date: August 23, 2022 Dept: S27
1. Background
Facts
Plaintiff, Victoria Rosales filed
this action against Defendants, Solomon Laktineh, MD (“Laktineh”) and Solomon
Laktineh, M.D., a medical corporation (“Laktineh Corporation”) on 1/13/22. Plaintiff alleges she began working for
Defendants as a medical scribe on November 1, 2021. Plaintiff alleges Laktineh would often touch
and massage her shoulders in a sexually suggestive manner despite Plaintiff
advising she did not want to be touched and did not like Laktineh’s mssages. Plaintiff alleges that when Plaintiff saw a
mother come in with her newborn and remarked “being around newborns makes me
want to have a baby,” Laktineh told her he would give her one in a lewd and
lascivious manner while engaging his hips and penis in a thrusting sexual
manner toward Plaintiff. Plaintiff
alleges that due to her refusal to succumb to Laktineh’s sexual advances, on
November 19, 2021, she was notified that she was terminated.
The operative complaint alleges
causes of action for:
1. Sexual
Harassment in Violation of FEHA – Quid Pro Quo
2. Sexual
Harassment in Violation of FEHA – Hostile Work Environment
3. Discrimination
Based on Sex in Violation of FEHA
4. Failure
to Prevent Discrimination and Harassment
5. Retaliation
6. Negligent
Infliction of Emotional Distress
7. Wrongful
Termination in Violation of Public Policy
2. Motions
to Compel Further Responses
Plaintiff seeks a court order
compelling Defendant Laktineh to provide further responses to Plaintiff’s
Special Interrogatories, Set One.
While Plaintiff has filed a
separate statement setting forth the interrogatories at issue and Defendant’s
responses to the interrogatories, Plaintiff has failed to submit copies of the
special interrogatories served on Defendant Laktineh and the responses Laktineh
served on Plaintiff. Without copies of
the interrogatories served on Laktineh and the responses served by Laktineh,
the Court cannot confirm whether the responses set forth in the separate
statement are the same as the responses served by Laktineh.
Accordingly, the hearing on
Plaintiff’s motion to compel further responses is continued to October 13, 2022
at 8:30 a.m. in Department 27 of the Long Beach Courthouse. Plaintiff is ordered to submit copies of the
special interrogatories served on Defendant Laktineh and Laktineh’s responses
to these interrogatories.
Plaintiff is ordered to give
notice.
Parties who intend to submit
on this tentative must send an email to the court at gdcdepts27@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the tentative
as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. If
the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting
on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be
placed off calendar. If a party
submits on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and
must identify the party submitting on the tentative. If any party does not
submit on the tentative, the party should make arrangements to appear remotely
at the hearing on this matter.