Judge: Mark E. Windham, Case: 17STCP00326, Date: 2023-03-21 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 17STCP00326 Hearing Date: March 21, 2023 Dept: 26
Knapp, Petersen &
Clarke v. Thomas, et al.
MOTION FOR WAGE
GARNISHMENT ORDER
AGAINST JUDGMENT
DEBTOR’S SPOUSE
(CCP § 706.120 et seq.)
TENTATIVE
RULING:
Judgment
Creditor Knapp, Petersen & Clarke’s Motion
for Order Garnishing the Wages of Judgment Debtor’s Spouse is GRANTED.
ANALYSIS:
Petitioner Creditor
Knapp, Petersen & Clarke (“Judgment Creditor”) filed the instant Petition
to Confirm Arbitration Award against Respondent Jamie Thomas aka Jamie Zhou aka
Jamie Qun Zhou aka Jamie B. Zhou aka Jamie T. Zhou aka Bi Qun Zhou aka Biqun
Zhou aka Bi T. Zhou aka Bi Qun Vhou aka Bi Zhou aka Bi Q. Vhou aka Bi Qu-En
Zhou aka Jamie Zhoir (“Judgment Debtor”) on December 12, 2017. On April 25, 2018, judgment was entered in
favor Judgment Creditor and against Judgment Debtor. The judgment was amended
to add costs on June 6, 2018.
Judgment Creditor filed the instant Motion For Order
to Garnish the Judgment Debtor’s Spouse’s Wages on February 14, 2023. Joseph
Naylor Thomas filed an opposition / response on March 9, 2023 and Judgment
Creditor responded on March 14, 2023.
Discussion
“An earnings withholding order may not be issued against the
earnings of the spouse of the judgment debtor except by court order upon
noticed motion.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 706.109.) Family Code section 903,
subdivision (a) provides that in the case of a contract, a debt is incurred “at
the time the contract is made” and subdivision (b) provides that in the case of
a tort, a debt is incurred “at the time the tort occurs.” (Fam. Code, § 903,
subds. (a)-(b).) Family Code section 910, subdivision (a) provides that
“[e]xcept as otherwise expressly provided by statute, the community estate is
liable for a debt incurred by either spouse before or during marriage,
regardless of which spouse had the management and control of the property and
regardless of whether one or both spouses are parties to the debt or to a
judgment for the debt.” (Fam. Code, § 910, subd. (a).)
Judgment Creditor
presents an interspousal transfer grant deed demonstrating that Judgment Debtor
is married to Joseph Naylor Thomas (“Joseph Naylor Thomas”). (Motion, Roza Decl., Exh. C.) Thomas’
opposition / response contends that Thomas and Judgment Debtor separated in
August 2016 but does not indicate when they divorced, other than referring the
Court to the case number. (Opp., ¶1.) In any event, the debt that gives rise to
the judgment in this action accrued in 2015. (Motion, Roza Decl., Exh. B.) The
community estate is liable for the judgment under Family Code section
910, subdivision (a).
Joseph Naylor Thomas is a practicing physician at Fresenius
Medical Care at Olympia Medical Center and/or Pacifica Emergency Specialist
Physicians Medical Group/Pacifica Hospital of the Valley. (Id. at Exh. D.)
Judgment Creditor has been unable to
collect any part of the judgment from Judgment Debtor and interest continues to
accrue at ten percent per annum. (Id. at Exh. E.) Based on the
foregoing, Judgment Creditor is entitled to a court order garnishing the wages
of Joseph Naylor Thomas.
Conclusion
Judgment
Creditor Knapp, Petersen & Clarke’s Motion
for Order Garnishing the Wages of Judgment Debtor’s Spouse is GRANTED.
Moving party to give notice.