Judge: Mark E. Windham, Case: 19STLC11348, Date: 2023-06-22 Tentative Ruling

If you desire to submit on the tentative ruling, you may do so by e-mailing Dept. 26 at the Spring Street Courthouse until the morning of the motion hearing.

The e-mail address is SSCdept26@lacourt.org

The heading on your e-mail should contain the case name, number, hearing date, and that you submit. The message should indicate your name, contact information, and the party you represent. Please note, the above e-mail address is to inform the court of your submission on the tentative ruling. All other inquiries will not receive a response.

If there are no appearances by either side and no submission on the Court's tentative ruling, the matter will be placed OFF CALENDAR. 

Due to overcrowding concerns of COVID-19, all parties shall make every effort to schedule a remote appearance via LACourtConnect (https://my.lacourt.org/laccwelcome) for their next hearing. The parties shall register with LACourtConnect at least 2 hours prior to their scheduled hearing time. 

 **Please note we no longer use CourtCall** 


Case Number: 19STLC11348    Hearing Date: June 22, 2023    Dept: 26

 

Lara v. Mejia, et al.

MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS
 

(CCP §§ 2031.300, 2023.030)





TENTATIVE RULING
:  

           

Plaintiff Eveleen Lara’s (1) Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for Sanctions; and (2) Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One, and Request for Sanctions, are GRANTED. DEFENDANT DELMYS YESENIA FLORES MEJIA IS TO SERVE VERIFIED RESPONSES TO THE DISCOVERY REQUESTS WITHOUT OBJECTIONS WITHIN 20 DAYS’ SERVICE OF THIS ORDER. DEFENDANT AND COUNSEL OF RECORD ARE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY ORDERED TO PAY SANCTIONS OF $210.00 TO PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL WITHIN 20 DAYS’ SERVICE OF THIS ORDER.

 

 

ANALYSIS:

 

On April 14, 2021, Plaintiff Eveleen Lara (“Plaintiff”) served Form Interrogatories, Set One and Request for Production of Documents, Set One, on Defendant Delmys Yesenia Flores Mejia (“Defendant”). (Motion, Ly Decl., Exh. A.) Despite a meet and confer effort extending the deadline to serve verified responses without objections, Defendant has not done so. (Id. at Exh. B.) Plaintiff filed the instant (1) Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for Sanctions; and (1) Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One, and Request for Sanctions, on May 25, 2023. Defendant filed oppositions to the motions on June 7, 2023.

 

Discussion

 

There is no requirement for a prior meet and confer effort before a motion to compel initial responses can be filed. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.300.) Further, the motion can be brought any time after the responding party fails to provide the responses.  (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.300.) Based on Defendant’s failure to timely respond to the propounded discovery, Plaintiff is entitled to an order compelling service of verified responses to the discovery requests without objections. Defendant’s oppositions suggest that proper notice of the motions was not provided to defense counsel, but the proof of service shows service on Defendant’s attorney, Reza Lajevardi, Esq. Martinez, Dietrich & Zarcone. (Motions, Proof of Service, p. 2.) Apparently, another defense firm—Tharpe & Howell, LLP—has associated in as counsel for Defendant. (See Opps., Yegoyan Decl., ¶2.) The oppositions speak as though Tharpe & Howell, LLP is Defendant’s current counsel and that Martinez, Dietrich & Zarcone is Defendant’s prior counsel, but there has been no substitution of attorney in this action. (See id. at p. 3:7-23.) Nor do the oppositions cite to any authority to show that the motions had to be served on all of Defendant’s attorneys. Therefore, service of the motions was proper.

 

Defendant’s failure to timely respond constitutes a misuse of the discovery process. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2023.010, subd. (d).) Sanctions are appropriate under Code of Civil Procedure sections 2023.010 and 2023.030 and have been properly noticed. However, the amount sought is excessive. Under a lodestar calculation, sanctions are awarded in the amount of $420.00 based on two hours of attorney time billed at $150.00 per hour and the $60.00 filing fee. (Motions, Ly Decl., ¶7.)

 

Conclusion

 

Plaintiff Eveleen Lara’s (1) Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for Sanctions; and (2) Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One, and Request for Sanctions, are GRANTED. DEFENDANT DELMYS YESENIA FLORES MEJIA IS TO SERVE VERIFIED RESPONSES TO THE DISCOVERY REQUESTS WITHOUT OBJECTIONS WITHIN 20 DAYS’ SERVICE OF THIS ORDER. DEFENDANT AND COUNSEL OF RECORD ARE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY ORDERED TO PAY SANCTIONS OF $210.00 TO PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL WITHIN 20 DAYS’ SERVICE OF THIS ORDER.

 

 

Moving party to give notice.