Judge: Mark E. Windham, Case: 20STLC05081, Date: 2022-08-01 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 20STLC05081    Hearing Date: August 1, 2022    Dept: 26

DEMURRER

(CCP § 430.10, et seq.)

 

 

TENTATIVE RULING:

 

Defendant Gwen Austin’s Demurrer to the First Amended Complaint is OVERRULED AS TO THE FIRST THROUGH SEVENTH CAUESS OF ACTION AND SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND AS TO THE EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION.

 

DEFENDANT GWEN AUSTIN IS TO FILE AND SERVE AN ANSWER TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 20 DAYS OF THIS ORDER.

 ANALYSIS:

 

On June 17, 2020, Plaintiff Mashawn Green (“Plaintiff”) filed the Complaint in this action against Defendant Gwen Austin (erroneously sued as Quen Austin) (“Defendant”). Proof of personal service of the Complaint was not filed until January 19, 2022.

 

On April 6, 2022, the Court sustained Defendant’s Demurrer to the Complaint with 30 days’ leave to amend. (Minute Order, 04/06/22.) Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint on April 20, 2022. Defendant filed the instant Demurrer to the First Amended Complaint on May 25, 2022. No opposition has been filed to date.

 

Discussion

 

Defendant demurs to the First Amended Complaint for failure to allege sufficient facts to state a cause of action and uncertainty. (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subds. (e), (f).) The Demurrer is accompanied by a meet and confer declaration as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41. (Demurrer, Carini Decl., ¶¶4-6.) The Court notes that special demurrers are not permitted in the limited jurisdiction court. (Code Civ. Proc., § 92, subd. (c).) Therefore, the Court will not rule on the demurrer for uncertainty.

 

The First Amended Complaint lists causes of action for (1) breach of written contract; (2) breach of oral contract; (3) breach of fiduciary duty; (4) negligent misrepresentation; (5) negligence; (6) breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (7) constructive fraud; and (8) unjust enrichment. (FAC, pp. 11-12.) In support of these causes of action, Plaintiff includes nine pages of allegations. (Id. at pp. 3-11.)

 

To the extent the Demurrer is brought on the grounds that the First Amended Complaint does not allege sufficient facts to state a cause of action against Defendant, it only includes authority regarding the elements necessary to allege each cause of action. (Demurrer, pp. 8:15-10:2.) The Demurrer provides no analysis regarding whether the factual allegations in the First Amended Complaint support these elements. It merely sets forth the conclusion that Plaintiff has not alleged any facts in support of the causes of action. (Id. at p. 10:3-6.) The only cause of action for which the legal authority cited is sufficient to sustain the Demurrer without analysis of the facts alleged in the First Amended Complaint, is unjust enrichment. As Defendant points out, unjust enrichment is not a cause of action. (McBride v. Boughton (2004) 123 Cal.App.4th 379, 387.)

 

Based on the foregoing, the Demurrer to the First Amended Complaint is overruled as to the first through seventh causes of action and sustained without leave to amend as to the eighth cause of action.

 

Conclusion

 

Defendant Gwen Austin’s Demurrer to the First Amended Complaint is OVERRULED AS TO THE FIRST THROUGH SEVENTH CAUESS OF ACTION AND SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND AS TO THE EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION.

 

DEFENDANT GWEN AUSTIN IS TO FILE AND SERVE AN ANSWER TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 20 DAYS OF THIS ORDER.

 

 

Court clerk to give notice.