Judge: Mark E. Windham, Case: 20STLC09495, Date: 2022-09-12 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STLC09495 Hearing Date: September 12, 2022 Dept: 26
MOTION
TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS;
REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS 
 (CCP §§ 2030.290, 2031.300, 2023.010)
TENTATIVE RULING: 
Defendant Sonya Najera’s (1) Motion to Compel Responses to Form
Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for Sanctions; and (2) Motion to Compel
Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One, and Request for
Sanctions are GRANTED. PLAINTIFF LALEDA LACY IS ORDERED TO SERVE VERIFIED
RESPONSES, WITHOUT OBJECTION, TO THE DISCOVERY REQUESTS WITHIN 20 DAYS’ SERVICE
OF THIS ORDER. FURTHERMORE, PLAINTIFF LALEDA LACY IS ORDERED TO PAY SANCTIONS
OF $373.30 TO DEFENSE COUNSEL WITHIN 20 DAYS’ SERVICE OF THIS ORDER.
SERVICE OF MOTION: 
[X]
Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC 3.1300) OK
[X]
Correct Address (CCP 1013, 1013a) OK
[X]
16/21 Day Lapse (CCP 12c and 1005 (b)) OK
SUMMARY OF
COMPLAINT: Action for breach of contract.
REQUEST FOR RELIEF: Compel Plaintiff Laleda Lacy to
provide verified responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One and Request for
Production of Documents, Set One, without objections. Award Defendant sanctions
of $1,061.65 per motion.
OPPOSITION: Filed July 13, 2022. 
REPLY: None filed as of September
6, 2022.
ANALYSIS:
On February
28, 2022, Defendant Sonya Najera (erroneously sued as “Sonya Moya”) (“Defendant”)
served Form Interrogatories, Set One and Request for Production of Documents,
Set One, on Plaintiff Laleda Lacy. (Motions,
Alban Decl., Exh. A.) After Plaintiff Laleda Lacy failed to serve
responses, Defendant sought to meet and confer and extended the deadline to
respond. (Id. at Exh. B.) Following Plaintiff Laleda Lacy’s continued
failure to respond, Defendant filed the instant Motion to Compel Responses to
Form Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for Sanctions. (Id. at ¶d.) Plaintiff
Laleda Lacy’s attorney filed opposition declarations on July 13, 2022
confirming their non-cooperation with discovery. (Opp., Yeager Decl.) 
There is no requirement for a prior meet and confer effort
before a motion to compel initial responses can be filed. (Code Civ. Proc., §§
2030.290, 2031.300.) Further, the motion can be brought any time after the
responding party fails to provide the responses.  (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290, 2031.300.)
Based on their failure to respond to the propounded discovery, Defendant is
entitled to an order compelling Plaintiff Laleda Lacy to serve verified
responses to the Request for Production of Documents, Set One and Form
Interrogatories, Set One, without objections. 
Plaintiff Laleda Lacy’s failure to timely respond
constitutes a misuse of the discovery process. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2023.010,
subd. (d).) Sanctions are appropriate under Code of Civil Procedure sections
2023.010 and 2023.030 and have been properly noticed. However, the amount
sought is excessive. Under a lodestar calculation, the request for sanctions is
granted against Plaintiff Laleda Lacy in the amount of $373.30 based on one hour
of attorney time billed at $250.00 an hour, plus $61.65 in costs per motion.
(Motion, Alban Decl., ¶e.) 
Conclusion
Defendant Sonya Najera’s (1) Motion to Compel Responses to Form
Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for Sanctions; and (2) Motion to Compel
Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One, and Request for
Sanctions is GRANTED. PLAINTIFF LALEDA LACY IS ORDERED TO SERVE VERIFIED
RESPONSES, WITHOUT OBJECTION, TO THE DISCOVERY REQUESTS WITHIN 20 DAYS’ SERVICE
OF THIS ORDER. FURTHERMORE, PLAINTIFF LALEDA LACY IS ORDERED TO PAY SANCTIONS
OF $373.30 TO DEFENSE COUNSEL WITHIN 20 DAYS’ SERVICE OF THIS ORDER.
Moving party to give notice.