Judge: Mark E. Windham, Case: 21STLC01803, Date: 2022-08-31 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STLC01803 Hearing Date: August 31, 2022 Dept: 26
PROCEEDINGS: MOTION TO DEEM
REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, ADMITTED AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
MOVING
PARTY: Plaintiff Jimmy Garcia
RESPONDING
PARTY: None
MOTION
TO DEEM REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION ADMITTED
AND
REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
(CCP
§ 2033.280)
TENTATIVE RULING:
Plaintiff Jimmy Garcia’s Motion to Deem Requests for
Admission, Set One, Admitted and Request for Sanctions is GRANTED. DEFENDANT
CHARLES SAN NICHOLAS IS TO PAY PLAINITFF JIMMY GARICA SANCTIONS OF $260.00
WITHIN 20 DAYS’ SERVICE OF THIS ORDER.
SERVICE OF MOTION:
[X]
Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC 3.1300) OK
[X]
Correct Address (CCP 1013, 1013a) OK
[X]
16/21 Day Lapse (CCP 12c and 1005 (b)) OK
SUMMARY OF COMPLAINT:
Action for breach of contract.
RELIEF REQUESTED: Deem Requests for Admission, Set One, served
on Defendant Charles San Nicholas on May 12, 2022, admitted. Award Plaintiff
Garcia sanctions of $260.00.
OPPOSITION: None filed as of August 29, 2022.
REPLY: None
filed as of August 29, 2022.
ANALYSIS:
On May 12, 2022, Plaintiff Jimmy Garcia (“Plaintiff Garcia”)
served Requests for Admissions, Set One, on Defendant Charles San Nicholas
(“Defendant Charles”). (Motion, Garcia Decl.,
Exh. E.) Despite a meet and confer effort, no responses have been served. (Id.
at Exhs. F-H and ¶8.) Plaintiff Garcia filed the instant Motion to Deem
Requests for Admission, Set One, Admitted (“the Motion”) on July 19, 2022. No
opposition has been filed to date.
There is no requirement for a prior meet and confer effort
before a motion to deem requests for admission can be filed. (Code Civ. Proc.,
§ 2033.280.) Further, the motion can be brought any time after the responding
party fails to provide the responses. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280.) Due to
Defendant Charles’ failure to timely serve responses and resultant waiver of
objections, Plaintiff Garcia is entitled to an order deeming the Requests for
Admission admitted. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280.)
The Court is required to award sanctions under the moving
statute. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (c).) Sanctions are appropriate
under Code of Civil Procedure sections 2023.010 and 2023.030 and have been
properly noticed. “A pro se litigant cannot recover attorney's fees as a
discovery sanction, but he can recover the ‘reasonable expenses’ he has
‘incurred,’ including photocopying, computer-assisted legal research, and other
identifiable and allocable costs.” (Kravitz v. Superior Court (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 1015,
1017.) Plaintiff Garcia’s unopposed request for $260.00 based on time taken off
work and to file the Motion is granted. (Motions, Garcia Decl., ¶9.)
Conclusion
Plaintiff Jimmy Garcia’s Motion to Deem Requests for
Admission, Set One, Admitted and Request for Sanctions is GRANTED. DEFENDANT
CHARLES SAN NICHOLAS IS TO PAY PLAINITFF JIMMY GARICA SANCTIONS OF $260.00
WITHIN 20 DAYS’ SERVICE OF THIS ORDER.
Moving party to give notice.