Judge: Mark E. Windham, Case: 21STLC04072, Date: 2022-10-12 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STLC04072 Hearing Date: October 12, 2022 Dept: 26
VACATE
DISMISSAL AND ENTER JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
(CCP
§ 664.6)
SERVICE:
[X] Proof of Service Timely
Filed (CRC 3.1300) OK
[X] Correct Address (CCP 1013,
1013a) OK
[X] 16/21 Day Lapse (CCP 12c and
1005 (b)) OK
SUMMARY OF COMPLAINT: Action
for automobile subrogation.
RELIEF REQUESTED: Plaintiff moves for an order vacating the
dismissal of this action and entering judgment against Defendant pursuant to
the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement.
OPPOSITION: None filed as
of October 10, 2022.
REPLY: None filed as of October
10, 2022.
TENTATIVE RULING:
Plaintiff Fred Loya Insurance
Company’s Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement is GRANTED IN THE AMOUNT OF
$3,382.70 PRINCIPAL, $901.74 INTEREST, AND $374.80 COSTS.
ANALYSIS:
Plaintiff Fred
Loya Insurance Company (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant action for automobile
subrogation against Defendants Gerardo Copado and Pamela Copado (“Defendants”)
on May 25, 2021. On August 16, 2021, Plaintiff
filed a Notice of Settlement. Plaintiff filed the instant Motion to Enforce
Settlement and Enter Judgment on June 20, 2022. No opposition has been filed to
date.
Discussion
The Motion to Enforce Settlement is brought under Code of Civil
Procedure, section 664.6, which states in relevant part:
If parties to pending litigation
stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside the presence of the court
or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the
court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement.
If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties
to enforce the settlement until performance in full of the terms of the
settlement.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 664.6.) Prior
to January 1, 2021, “parties” under section 664.6 meant the litigants
themselves, not their attorneys. (Levy
v. Superior Court (1995) 10 Cal.4th 578, 586 (holding “we conclude that the
term ‘parties’ as used in section 664.6 means the litigants themselves, and
does not include their attorneys of record.”).) Additionally, the settlement
must have included the signatures of the parties seeking to enforce the
agreement, and against whom enforcement is sought. (J.B.B. Investment
Partners, Ltd. v. Fair (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 974, 985.)
The settlement agreement here complies with the statutory
requirements set forth above because it was signed by both parties and their
attorneys. (Motion, Tapper Decl., Exh. A, p. 5.) Therefore, the Court finds
that the parties’ settlement agreement is enforceable under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
The settlement agreement provides
that Defendants would pay Plaintiff $4,082.70 by way of monthly installments
starting on August 20, 2021. (Motion, Tapper Decl., Exh. A, ¶4.) The settlement
agreement also provides that if Defendants default, judgment in the settlement
amount, plus costs, and interest, may be entered in Plaintiff’s favor, less any
amounts paid. (Id. at Exh. A, ¶5.)
Defendants have made payments
totaling $700.00 but have since defaulted. (Id. at ¶4.) This evidence
demonstrates that Plaintiff is entitled to entry of judgment in the amount of $3,382.70
principal, ($4,082.70 - $700.00), $901.74 interest, $ 374.80 costs. (Id.
at ¶5.)
Conclusion
Plaintiff Fred Loya Insurance
Company’s Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement is GRANTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,382.70
PRINCIPAL, $901.74 INTEREST, AND $374.80 COSTS.
Moving party to give notice.