Judge: Mark E. Windham, Case: 21STLC05512, Date: 2023-04-24 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STLC05512 Hearing Date: April 24, 2023 Dept: 26
State Farm v. Avila,
et al.
MOTION FOR ISSUE SANCTIONS
(CCP § 2023.010, et al.)
TENTATIVE RULING:
Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s Motion
for Issue Sanctions is GRANTED. THE REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTION IS DENIED.
ANALYSIS:
On July 28, 2021,
Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“Plaintiff”)
filed this action for automobile subrogation against Defendant Maricela Avila
(“Defendant”). On December 5, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to
compel responses to form interrogatories and request for monetary sanctions.
(Minute Order, 12/05/22.)
Plaintiff filed the
instant motion for issue and monetary sanctions on January 23, 2023. No
opposition has been filed to date.
Discussion
Where a party willfully
disobeys a discovery order, courts have discretion to impose terminating,
issue, evidence or monetary sanctions. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2023.010, subds.
(d), (g); R.S. Creative, Inc. v. Creative Cotton, Ltd. (1999) 75
Cal.App.4th 486, 495.) Here, Plaintiff requests issue sanctions with respect to
the form interrogatories Defendant was required to respond. The Court finds
that notice of its ruling compelling Defendant’s responses was served on
December 6, 2022 and that the responses were to be served within 20 days.
(Notice of Ruling, 12/06/22.) Defendant has failed to serve responses as
ordered. (Motion, Cicione Decl., ¶9.) Defendant was also ordered to pay
sanctions by December 26, 2022 and failed in that regard, as well. (Id.
at ¶10.)
Therefore, the Court
finds Defendant’s non-compliance to be willful and subject to the requested
issue sanctions. Insofar as the form interrogatories sought to obtain information
regarding what alleged facts from the complaint Defendant disputed, Plaintiff’s
request to deem those alleged facts true is granted. The facts deemed true and
undisputed are, as follows:
1.
Defendant Maricela Avila was the driver of a certain
motor vehicle described as a 2015 Kia Optima with California license plate
7HND8l2.
2.
On or about May II, 2020, Defendant was driving the
2015 Kia Optima with California license plate 7HND812 at and about the
intersection of Main Street and Westminster Avenue in the city of Los Angeles,
California 90291 and collided said vehicle into Plaintiffs Insured 's 2017 BMW
330i with California license plate 7ZMJ684.
3.
That on or about May 11, 2020, Defendant was negligent
in the operation of her vehicle at the time of the collision.
4.
That as a direct and proximate result of Defendant’s
negligence, Plaintiffs Insured 2017 BMW 330i with California license plate
7ZMJ684 sustained damages in the sum of $12,531.57.
5.
That the cost to repair Plaintiff's Insured's 2017 BMW
330i with California license plate 7ZMJ684 in the sum of $12,531.57 was
reasonable.
6.
That Plaintiff paid for the damages sustained to
Plaintiffs Insured’s 2017 BMW 330i with California license plate 7ZMJ684 in the
amount of $12,531.57 (less Plaintiff’s Insured’s $500.00 deductible) and is
thereby subrogated to the rights of its insured to recover said sum from
Defendant.
(See Motion, Separate
Statement.) In light of Defendant’s repeated failure to respond to properly
served discovery, the court finds that issue sanctions are appropriate pursuant
to Code of Civil Procedure sections 2023.010 and 2023.030. Nor has Plaintiff
filed any opposition to the motion to compel, or to the instant motion, to
explain the failure to provide the required responses. However, the request for
additional monetary sanctions is denied as futile and punitive.
Conclusion
Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s Motion
for Issue Sanctions is GRANTED. THE REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTION IS DENIED.
Moving party to give notice.