Judge: Mark E. Windham, Case: 21STLC08321, Date: 2023-07-24 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STLC08321 Hearing Date: July 24, 2023 Dept: 26
Interinsurance
Exchange v. Barboza-Banda, et al.
ENTER
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
(CCP
§ 664.6)
TENTATIVE RULING:
Plaintiff Interinsurance Exchange
of the Automobile Club’s Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement and Enter
Judgment is GRANTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,215.13 PRINCIPAL, $2,557.98 INTEREST,
AND $225.00 COSTS.
ANALYSIS:
Plaintiff
Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant
action for automobile subrogation against Defendants Francisco Barboza-Banda and
Sara Avalos (“Defendants”) on November
19, 2021. On August 10, 2022, Plaintiff
filed a notice of conditional settlement and the Court set an Order to Show
Cause regarding dismissal (settlement), which is currently set for July 24,
2023. Plaintiff filed the instant motion to enforce settlement and enter judgment on May 24, 2023. No
opposition has been filed to date.
Discussion
The instant motion is brought under Code of Civil Procedure, section
664.6, which states in relevant part:
If parties to pending litigation
stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside the presence of the court
or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the
court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement.
If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties
to enforce the settlement until performance in full of the terms of the
settlement.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 664.6, subd.
(a).) Prior to January 1, 2021, “parties” under section 664.6 meant the
litigants themselves, not their attorneys.
(Levy v. Superior Court (1995) 10 Cal.4th 578, 586.) The current
statute provides that “parties” includes “an attorney who represents the party”
and an insurer’s agent. (Code Civ. Proc., § 664.6, subd. (b).) The settlement
must include the signatures of the parties seeking to enforce the agreement,
and against whom enforcement is sought. (J.B.B. Investment Partners, Ltd. v.
Fair (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 974, 985.) The settlement agreement here complies with the statutory
requirements set forth above because it was signed by Plaintiff’s counsel and
Defendants. (Motion, Tapper Decl., Exh. A, p. 5.) Therefore, the Court finds
that the parties’ settlement agreement is enforceable under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
The settlement agreement provides
that Defendants would pay Plaintiff $11,815.13 plus ten percent interest and
court costs by making monthly payments starting on November 19, 2020. (Id.
at Exh. A, ¶¶1-3.) The settlement agreement also provides that if Defendants default,
judgment in the settlement amount, less monies paid, may be entered in
Plaintiff’s favor. (Id. at Exh. A, ¶5.) Defendants have only made
payments in the amount of $1,600.00 and, thereafter defaulted. (Id. at ¶4.)
Plaintiff seeks an order entering judgment against Defendants based on the settlement
amount of $10,215.13 principal ($11,815.13 - $1,600.00), $2,557.98 interest at
ten percent per annum from November 19, 2020, and $225.00 costs. (Id. at
¶5.)
Conclusion
Therefore, Plaintiff
Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club’s Motion to Enforce Settlement
Agreement and Enter Judgment is GRANTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,215.13 PRINCIPAL, $2,557.98
INTEREST, AND $225.00 COSTS.
Moving party to give notice.