Judge: Mark E. Windham, Case: 21STLC08637, Date: 2023-09-05 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STLC08637 Hearing Date: September 5, 2023 Dept: 26
Shaughnessy v. Misetich, et al.
MOTION TO
VACATE JUDGMENT
(CCP § 473(b))
TENTATIVE RULING:
Defendant Dawn Misetich’s Motion to
Vacate Judgment is GRANTED. THE ORDER DATED JUNE 7, 2023 IS VACATED. TRIAL IS
RE-SET FOR DECEMBER 5, 2024 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 26 IN THE SPRING STREET
COURTHOUSE.
ANALYSIS:
On December 8, 2021, Plaintiff
Michael E. Shaughnessy (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant action against
Defendants Dorothy J. Misetich (“Defendant Dorothy”) and Dawn E. Misetich
(“Defendant Dawn”). Defendants separately filed answers, in properia persona,
on February 1, 2022. The case came for trial on June 7, 2023, at which time
Defendants did not appear. (Minute Order, 06/07/23.) Following Plaintiff’s
showing, the Court awarded judgment in his favor and ordered him to file a
proposed judgment. (Ibid.)
Defendant Dawn’s ex parte application to vacate the judgment
was denied on June 26, 2023. (Minute Order, 06/26/23.) Plaintiff filed a notice
of entry of judgment, but no proposed judgment to date. It appears that
Plaintiff continues to file requests for default judgment when there is no
default in this action.
Defendant Dawn then filed the instant Motion to Vacate
Judgment on July 21, 2023. Plaintiff filed an opposition on July 31, 2023.
Discussion
Defendant Dawn brings
this motion pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 473, subdivision (b).
Under this statute, an application for relief must be made no more than six
months after entry of the order from which relief is sought and must be
accompanied by an affidavit of fault attesting to the moving party’s mistake,
inadvertence, surprise or neglect. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b); English
v. IKON Business Solutions (2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 130, 143.) When based on
attorney fault with respect to entry of default, default judgment, or
involuntary dismissal, a timely request for relief must be granted. (Code Civ.
Proc., § 473, subd. (b).) When brought pursuant to the provision for
discretionary relief based on party fault, the request must have been filed
within a reasonable amount of time.
The motion was timely filed within six months of the trial
date and is supported by an affidavit of fault. Defendant Dawn declares that
she never had notice of the trial date and did not learn of the trial date
until receipt of the June 7, 2023 minute order in the mail. (Motion, Dawn
Misetich Decl., ¶¶3-5.) In opposition, Plaintiff also admits that he only
learned of the trial date by checking online. (Opp., p. 2:3-6.) It appears,
that as a pro per litigant, Plaintiff did not realize the trial date was
provided by the Court in the Third Amended Standing Order, filed December 8,
2022. (Third Amended General Order, filed 12/08/21, ¶2.) The Third Amended
General Order specifically orders Plaintiff to serve a copy on Defendants with
the Summons and Complaint. (Third Amended General Order, filed 12/08/21, ¶1.)
Defendants were not served with the Third Amended General Order with the
Summons and Complaint. (Proofs of Service, filed 07/31/23, ¶¶1-2.) Therefore,
Defendants were not provided with notice of the trial date and were denied the
opportunity to appear.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, Defendant Dawn
Misetich’s Motion to Vacate Judgment is GRANTED. THE ORDER DATED JUNE 7, 2023
IS VACATED. TRIAL IS RE-SET FOR DECEMBER 5, 2024 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 26 IN
THE SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE.
Court clerk to give notice.