Judge: Mark E. Windham, Case: 21STLC09037, Date: 2023-09-26 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 21STLC09037    Hearing Date: September 26, 2023    Dept: 26

 

Intellectual Property v. Cruz, et al.

MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL
(CCP § 473(b))



TENTATIVE RULING:

 

Plaintiff Intellectual Property’s Motion to Vacate Dismissal is GRANTED. THE DISMISSAL ENTERED ON JULY 3, 2023 IS VACATED.

 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE IS SET FOR DECEMBER 4, 2023 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 26 IN THE SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE.

 

 

ANALYSIS:

 

On December 22, 2021, Plaintiff Intellectual Property (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant action for breach of contract and fraud against Defendants Elizabeth Cruz and Ruben Cruz (“Defendants”). No proof of service of the Summons and Complaint has been filed as to Defendants and the case came for trial on July 3, 2023. When Plaintiff failed to appear at trial, the Court dismissed the action without prejudice. (Minute Order, 07/03/23.)

 

Plaintiff filed the instant Motion to Vacate Dismissal on August 30, 2023. No opposition to the Motion has been filed to date.

 

Discussion

 

The motion is brought pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 473, subdivision (b). Under this statute, an application for relief must be made no more than six months after entry of the order from which relief is sought and must be accompanied by an affidavit of fault attesting to the moving party’s mistake, inadvertence, surprise or neglect. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b); English v. IKON Business Solutions (2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 130, 143.) When based on attorney fault with respect to entry of default, default judgment, or involuntary dismissal, a timely request for relief must be granted. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b).) When brought pursuant to the provision for discretionary relief based on party fault, the request must have been filed within a reasonable amount of time.

 

The motion was timely filed within six months of dismissal of the action and is supported by an affidavit of attorney fault. Plaintiff’s counsel declares that they suffered numerous health setbacks this year and were unable to attend to this action. (Motion, Bowman Decl., ¶¶3-6.) Therefore, the case must be reinstated under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b).

 

Conclusion

 

Plaintiff Intellectual Property’s Motion to Vacate Dismissal is GRANTED. THE DISMISSAL ENTERED ON JULY 3, 2023 IS HEREBY VACATED.

 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE IS SET FOR DECEMBER 4, 2023 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 26 IN THE SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE.

 

 

Moving party to give notice.