Judge: Mark E. Windham, Case: 22STCP01194, Date: 2022-10-27 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCP01194 Hearing Date: October 27, 2022 Dept: 26
PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD
(CCP § 1285, et seq.)
TENTATIVE RULING:
Petitioner North American Bancard,
LLC’s Petition to Confirm Arbitration
Award is GRANTED. JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PETITIONER NORTH AMERICAN
BANCARD, LLC IN THE AMOUNT OF $19,234.22. PETITIONER IS TO FILE A PROPOSED
JUDGMENT WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS OF THIS ORDER.
ANALYSIS:
On March 16, 2022,
an Arbitration Award was issued in favor of North American Bancard, LLC (“Petitioner”) and against Respondents OVC
Corporation d/b/a Fire Marketing Partners (“Respondent OVC”) and Onosma Chea
(“Respondent Chea”). Petitioner filed the instant Petition to Confirm
Arbitration Award (the “Petition”) against Respondents on April 1, 2022. Proofs
of service were filed on May 9, 2022. The Petition initially came for hearing
on August 5, 2022 and was continued by the Court to October 27, 2022. (Minute
Order, 08/05/22.) No opposition has been filed to date.
Legal Standard
“Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made
may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondent all
parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound
by the arbitration award.” (Code Civ.
Proc., § 1285.) “If a petition or response under this chapter is duly
served and filed, the court shall confirm the award as made, whether rendered
in this state or another state, unless in accordance with this chapter it
corrects the award and confirms it as corrected, vacates the award or dismisses
the proceeding.” (Code Civ. Proc., §
1286.)
A response to a
Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award that seeks to vacate or correct the award
must be served and filed no later than 100 days after the date of the service
of a signed copy of the award on the respondent. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1288.2.)
Discussion
Service of the Petition and Notice of Hearing
Code of Civil
Procedure, section 1290.4 requires that the Petition and Notice of Hearing be
served on Respondent “in the manner provided in the arbitration agreement for
the service of such petition and notice” or “[i]f the arbitration agreement does
not provide the manner in which such service shall be made . . . [s]ervice
within this State shall be made in the manner provided by law for the service
of summons in an action.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1290.4, subds. (a), (b).)
The arbitration
agreement does not provide the manner in which the Petition and Notice of
Hearing should be served. (Pet., Attachment 4(b), ¶1.50.) Therefore, service
must be made in the manner provided for by law for service of a summons, which
is set forth at Code of Civil Procedure sections 415.10 through 415.95. Proof
of service has been filed and demonstrate personal service of the Petition and
Notice of Hearing on Respondents. (Proof of Service, 05/09/22; Proof of
Service, 09/28/22.) Therefore, Petitioner has demonstrated service in compliance
with Code of Civil Procedure section 1290.4.
Service of the Arbitration Award and Timing of Service
of Petition (CCP §§ 1283.6, 1288, 1288.4)
Code of Civil
Procedure section 1283.6 requires that “[t]he neutral arbitrator shall serve a
signed copy of the award on each party to the arbitration personally or by
registered or certified mail or as provided in the agreement.” (Code Civ.
Proc., § 1283.6.) This requirement may be satisfied by service by the
arbitration, or upon proper service of the Award with the Petition. (See Murry v. Civil Service Employees Ins. Co. (1967) 254 Cal.App.2d 796, 799-800.)
The copy of the
Arbitration Award is not accompanied by any proof of service. (Pet., Attachment
8(c).) However, Petitioner has shown that the Award was served on Respondents with
the instant Petition, which is sufficient. The Petition was served
approximately five weeks after the Award was issued. Therefore, the
requirements of Code of Civil Procedure sections 1283.6, 1288 and 1288.4 have
been satisfied.
Confirmation of the Arbitration Award
An arbitration award
is not directly enforceable until it is confirmed by a court and judgment is
entered. (CCP § 1287.6; Jones v.
Kvistad (1971) 19 Cal.App.3d 836, 840.) The court must confirm the award as
made, unless it corrects or vacates the award, or dismisses the
proceeding. (CCP § 1286; Valsan
Partners Limited Partnership v. Calcor Space Facility, Inc. (1994) 25
Cal.App.4th 809, 818.) Code of Civil Procedure, section 1285.4 states a
petition under this chapter shall:
a)
Set forth the substance of or have attached a copy of
the agreement to arbitrate unless the petitioner denies the existence of such
an agreement.
b)
Set forth the names of the arbitrators.
c)
Set forth or have attached a copy of the award and the
written opinion of the arbitrators, if any.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.4.) The Petition complies with the
above requirements. It sets forth the nature of the agreement to arbitrate and
the name of the Arbitrator. (Pet.,
¶¶4-6 and Attachment 8(c).) The Petition also attaches a copy of the
Award, which awards Petitioner $19,234.22. Therefore, the Court finds that the
substantive portion of the Petition has been satisfied.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, the Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award is GRANTED.
JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PETITIONER NORTH AMERICAN BANCARD, LLC IN
THE AMOUNT OF $19,234.22. PETITIONER IS TO FILE A PROPOSED JUDGMENT WITHIN TEN
(10) DAYS OF THIS ORDER.
Petitioner to give notice.