Judge: Mark E. Windham, Case: 22STCP03771, Date: 2023-02-21 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22STCP03771    Hearing Date: February 21, 2023    Dept: 26

  Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., et al. v. Meyer, et al.

PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD

(CCP § 1285)

TENTATIVE RULING:

 

Petitioners Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and Paul Wetmore’s Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award is GRANTED. THE COURT ORDERS EXPUNGEMENT OF ALL REFERENCES TO THE SUBJECT ARBITRATION PROCEEDING FROM REGISTRATION RECORDS MAINTAINED BY THE CENTRAL REGISTRATION DEPOSITORY (“CRD”) FOR PETITIONER PAUL WETMORE.

 

PETITIONERS TO FILE A PROPOSED JUDGMENT WITHIN 20 DAYS OF THIS ORDER.

 

ANALYSIS:

 

Petitioners Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and Paul Wetmore (“Petitioners”) filed the instant Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award against Respondent Greg Meyer (“Respondent”) on October 17, 2022. The Petition seeks to confirm the arbitration award issued by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) on Augsut 19, 2022 in favor of Petitioners, requiring expungement of all references to certain customer dispute information maintained by the Central Registration Depository (“CRD”). (Pet., ¶10g.)

 

Legal Standard

 

“Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.  The petition shall name as respondent all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.) “If a petition or response under this chapter is duly served and filed, the court shall confirm the award as made, whether rendered in this state or another state, unless in accordance with this chapter it corrects the award and confirms it as corrected, vacates the award or dismisses the proceeding.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1286.)

 

Discussion

 

Filing Requirements of a Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award (CCP § 1285.4)

 

Code of Civil Procedure section 1285.4 states: “A petition under this chapter shall:

 

(a)   Set forth the substance of or have attached a copy of the agreement to arbitrate unless the petitioner denies the existence of such an agreement.

 

(b)   Set forth the names of the arbitrators.

 

(c) Set forth or have attached a copy of the award and the written opinion of the arbitrators, if any.”

 

(Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.4 (emphasis added).) Petitioners have submitted a copy of the Arbitration Agreement, the name of the arbitrator, and a copy of the Arbitration Award (Pet., Exhs. 4(b) and 8(c).) This satisfies Code of Civil Procedure section 1285.4, subdivisions (a)-(c).

 

Service of the Petition and Notice of Hearing (CCP § 1290.4)

 

Code of Civil Procedure section 1290.4 states in pertinent part:

 

“(a) A copy of the petition and a written notice of the time and place of the hearing thereof and any other papers upon which the petition is based shall be served in the manner provided in the arbitration agreement for the service of such petition and notice.

 

(b) If the arbitration agreement does not provide the manner in which such service shall be made and the person upon whom service is to be made has not previously appeared in the proceeding and has not previously been served in accordance with this subdivision: ¶ (1) Service within this State shall be made in the manner provided by law for the service of summons in an action.”

 

(Code Civ. Proc., § 1290.4.) Petitioners filed proof of service showing that the Petition papers and notice of hearing were personally served on Respondent on October 19, 2022. (Proof of Personal Service, filed 11/01/22.) Therefore, the Court finds that the service requirements of Code of Civil Procedure section 1290.4 have been met.

 

Service of the Arbitration Award (CCP § 1283.6)

         

Code of Civil Procedure section 1283.6 provides that: “The neutral arbitrator shall serve a signed copy of the award on each party to the arbitration personally or by registered or certified mail or as provided in the agreement.”  (Emphasis added.) This requirement may be satisfied by service by the arbitration, or upon proper service of the Award with the Petition. (See Murry v. Civil Service Employees Ins. Co. (1967) 254 Cal.App.2d 796, 799-800.) The Award was served by the arbitrator on August 19, 2022, but the manner of service is not indicated. (Pet., Exh. 8(c), p. 6.) However, because a copy of the Award was served with the instant Petition, the statutory requirements for service of the Award are satisfied.

 

Timing of Service of Petition (CCP §§ 1288, 1288.4)

           

A party may seek a court judgment confirming an arbitration award by filing and serving a petition no more than four years, but not less than 10 days, after the award is served. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1288, 1288.4.) The Petition was timely filed and served two months after the arbitration award was issued.

 

Merits of the Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award

 

The court must confirm the award as made, unless it corrects or vacates the award, or dismisses the proceeding.  (Code Civ. Proc., § 1286; Valsan Partners Limited Partnership v. Calcor Space Facility, Inc. (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 809, 818.) Petitioners have demonstrated that on August 19, 2022, the arbitrator issued an Arbitration Award in their favor and against Respondent requiring expungement of all references to certain customer dispute information maintained by the CRD regarding Petitioner Wetmore. (Pet., Exh. 8(c), pp. 3-4.)

 

Conclusion

 

Therefore, the Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award is GRANTED. THE COURT ORDERS EXPUNGEMENT OF ALL REFERENCES TO THE SUBJECT ARBITRATION PROCEEDING FROM REGISTRATION RECORDS MAINTAINED BY THE CENTRAL REGISTRATION DEPOSITORY (“CRD”) FOR PETITIONER PAUL F. WETMORE.

 

PETITIONERS TO FILE A PROPOSED JUDGMENT WITHIN 20 DAYS OF THIS ORDER.

 

 

Moving party is to give notice.