Judge: Mark E. Windham, Case: 22STLC02171, Date: 2023-03-06 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STLC02171 Hearing Date: March 6, 2023 Dept: 26
Mao v. Adan, et al.
MOTION
TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES;
REQUEST
FOR SANCTIONS
(CCP
§§ 2030.290, 2023.010)
TENTATIVE RULING:
Defendant Hasan Mohamed Adan’s (1)
Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for
Sanctions; and (2) Motion to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set
One, and Request for Sanctions are GRANTED.
PLAINTIFF SHAN MAO IS TO SERVE
VERIFIED RESPONSES TO THE INTERROGATORIES WITHOUT OBJECTIONS WITHIN 20 DAYS’
SERVICE OF THIS ORDER. PLAINTIFF IS FURTHER ORDERED TO PAY SANCTIONS OF $623.30 TO DEFENSE COUNSEL WITHIN 20 DAYS’
SERVICE OF THIS ORDER.
ANALYSIS:
On June 17, 2022, Defendant Hasan Mohamed Adan (“Defendant”)
served Form Interrogatories, Set One, and Special Interrogatories, Set One, on
Plaintiff Shan Mao (“Plaintiff”). (Motions, Alban
Decl., Exh. A.) Despite a meet and confer effort extending the deadline
to respond to the requests, Plaintiff has not served responses. (Id. at
Exh. B.) Defendant filed the instant (1) Motion to Compel Responses to Form
Interrogatories, Set One; and Request for Sanctions; and (2) Motion to Compel
Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One; Request for Sanctions, on
February 7, 2023. No oppositions have been filed to date.
Discussion
There is no requirement for a prior meet and confer effort
before a motion to compel initial responses can be filed. (Code Civ. Proc., §
2030.290.) Further, the motion can be brought any time after the responding
party fails to provide the responses.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290.) Based on Plaintiff’s failure to respond
to the propounded discovery, Defendant is entitled to an order compelling Plaintiff
to serve verified responses to the interrogatories without objections.
Plaintiff’s failure to timely respond constitutes a misuse
of the discovery process. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2023.010, subd. (d).) Sanctions
are appropriate under Code of Civil Procedure sections 2023.010 and 2023.030
and have been properly noticed. However, the amount sought is excessive under a
lodestar calculation. Sanctions are awarded in the amount of $623.30 based on
two hours of attorney time billed at $250.00 per hour, and $61.65 in costs per
motion. (Motions, Alban Decl.,
¶d.)
Conclusion
Defendant Hasan Mohamed Adan’s (1)
Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for
Sanctions; and (2) Motion to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set
One, and Request for Sanctions are GRANTED.
PLAINTIFF SHAN MAO IS TO SERVE
VERIFIED RESPONSES TO THE INTERROGATORIES WITHOUT OBJECTIONS WITHIN 20 DAYS’
SERVICE OF THIS ORDER. PLAINTIFF IS FURTHER ORDERED TO PAY SANCTIONS OF $623.30 TO DEFENSE COUNSEL WITHIN 20 DAYS’
SERVICE OF THIS ORDER.
Moving party to give notice.