Judge: Mark E. Windham, Case: 23STLC04036, Date: 2024-04-30 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 23STLC04036    Hearing Date: April 30, 2024    Dept: 26

 

Bahlaievskyi v. Petrosian, et al.

MOTION TO VACATE ENTRY OF DEFAULT

(CCP §§ 473(b), 473.5, 473(d))


TENTATIVE RULING:

 

Defendant Janet Petrosian Motion to Vacate Entry of Default is DENIED.

 

                                                                                                                               

ANALYSIS:

 

On June 26, 2023, Plaintiff Bohdan Bahlaievskyi (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant action against Defendant Janet Petrosian (“Defendant”). When Defendant failed to file a responsive pleading, Plaintiff obtained their default on October 11, 2023.

 

On January 12, 2024, Defendant filed the instant Motion to Vacate Default. No opposition has been filed to date.

 

Discussion

 

Defendant moves to vacate the entry of default pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b) and (d), and section 473.5. The Court will consider each statutory basis in turn.

 

Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b)

 

Under this statute, an application for relief must be made no more than six months after entry of the order from which relief is sought, and must be accompanied by an affidavit of fault attesting to the mistake, inadvertence, surprise or neglect of the moving party or its attorney. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b); English v. IKON Business Solutions (2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 130, 143.) The motion must also be accompanied by a copy of the moving defendant’s proposed pleading. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b).) This can be corrected if Defendant submits a proposed responsive pleading by the hearing date. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b); Carmel, Ltd. v. Tavoussi (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 393, 403.)

 

A request for relief under the discretionary prong, based on party fault, must not only be made within six months of entry of default but within a reasonable time. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b).) The Motion was filed five-and-a-half months after notice of the request for entry of default was mailed to Defendant at the same address where they were personally served with the Summons and Complaint. (Proof of Personal Service, filed 08/02/23, ¶¶4-5; Request for Entry of Default, filed 10/11/23, ¶6.)

Defendant does not demonstrate that was a reasonable amount of time to seek relief because the Motion does not address this requirement through argument or evidence. (See Caldwell v. Methodist Hospital (1994) 24 Cal.App.4th 1521, 1524 [citing Carrasco v. Craft (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 796, 805] [“Where the statute requires that “ ‘ “the application must be made within a ‘reasonable time’ … what is a reasonable time in any case depends upon the circumstances of that particular case.” While in “the determination of that question, a large discretion is necessarily confided to [the trial] court” ... there must be some showing—some evidence—as the basis for the exercise of such discretion.’ ”].)

 

The Motion also fails to attach a declaration of fault from Defendant demonstrating that default was entered due to their mistake, surprise, inadvertence, or excusable neglect. The only supporting declaration is from defense counsel, who cannot attest to Defendant’s fault. Finally, the Motion does not attach a copy of Defendant’s proposed responsive pleading. As none of the requirements for relief from the default under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b) have been demonstrated, the Motion on these grounds must be denied.

 

Code of Civil Procedure section 473.5

 

The Motion is also brought under Code of Civil Procedure section 473.5, subdivision (a):

 

When service of a summons has not resulted in actual notice to a party in time to defend the action and a default or default judgment has been entered against him or her in the action, he or she may serve and file a notice of motion to set aside the default or default judgment and for leave to defend the action.  The notice of motion shall be served and filed within a reasonable time, but in no event exceeding the earlier of: (i) two years after entry of a default judgment against him or her; or (ii) 180 days after service on him or her of a written notice that the default or default judgment has been entered.

 

(Code Civ. Proc., § 473.5, subd. (a).) Additionally, the motion “shall be accompanied by an affidavit showing under oath that the party's lack of actual notice in time to defend the action was not caused by his or her avoidance of service or inexcusable neglect. The party shall serve and file with the notice a copy of the answer, motion, or other pleading proposed to be filed in the action.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 473.5, subd. (b).)

 

This statute also contains a reasonable diligence requirement, which has not been met. Nor has Defendant shown their lack of actual notice of this lawsuit, or that such lack of notice was not caused by avoidance of service or inexcusable neglect, without a supporting declaration based on personal knowledge. Finally, no copy of the proposed responsive pleading has been filed. As none of the requirements for relief from the default under Code of Civil Procedure section 473.5 have been demonstrated, the Motion on these grounds must also be denied.

 

Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (d)

 

Finally, Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (d) states that “[t]he court may, .... on motion of either party after notice to the other party, set aside any void judgment or order.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (d).) As Defendant points out, a void judgment or order can result due to improper service. (Citing Trackman v. Kenney (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 175, 180.) The Motion does not demonstrate improper service of the Summons and Complaint. As previously noted, the declaration of defense counsel cannot attest to service of the papers on Defendant and in any event, does not do so. Rather, defense counsel declares that Defendant did not file an answer due to excusable neglect and ignorance. (Motion, Chapman Decl., ¶6.) Therefore, Defendant has not demonstrated they are entitled to relief under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (d).

 

Conclusion

 

Defendant Janet Petrosian Motion to Vacate Entry of Default is DENIED.

 

 

Court clerk to give notice.