Judge: Mark E. Windham, Case: LAM17K04913, Date: 2022-12-05 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: LAM17K04913 Hearing Date: December 5, 2022 Dept: 26
Marina Pacifica HOA v.
Fisher, et al.
MOTION TO RECLASSIFY
(CCP § 403.040)
TENTATIVE RULING:
Plaintiff Marina
Pacific Homeowners Association’s Motion to Reclassify Action is GRANTED. THIS
CASE IS RECLASSIFIED AS AN UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE AND TRANSFERRED TO THE
RECLASSIFICATION/TRANSFER DESK FOR COLLECTION OF FEES AND REASSIGNMENT TO AN
INDEPENDENT CALENDAR COURT. PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE RECLASSIFICATION FEE WITHIN
TEN (10) DAYS OF THIS ORDER.
ANALYSIS:
On April 21, 2017,
Plaintiff Marina Pacifica Homeowners Association (“Plaintiff”) filed this
action against Defendant Pamela Fisher (“Defendant”) for failure to pay
Association fees. On September 28, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Stay due
to Defendant’s bankruptcy filing. On November 26, 2019, Plaintiff filed a
Notice of Termination of Stay.
Plaintiff filed the
instant Motion to Reclassify the Action to a Court of Unlimited Jurisdiction
(“Motion”) on November 27, 2019. Prior to the Motion being heard, Defendant
filed a second Notice of Stay due to a second bankruptcy filing. At the Status
Conference Re Stay of Proceeding on August 25, 2020, Plaintiff’s counsel stated
the bankruptcy was still pending and the Court continued the Status Conference
and hearing on the Motion to Reclassify to October 21, 2020, while keeping the
bankruptcy stay in place. (Minute Order, 08/25/20.) The Status Conference and
Motion to Reclassify were then continued multiple times on the same grounds
until the current hearing date of December 5, 2022. (Minute Orders, 10/21/20;
03/18/21; 05/26/21; 08/30/21; 12/15/21, 06/15/22.) On July 19, 2022, Plaintiff
filed a Notice of Termination or Modification of Stay. To date, no opposition
has been filed to the Motion to Reclassify.
Discussion
Code of Civil
Procedure section 403.040 allows a plaintiff to file a motion for
reclassification of an action within the time allowed for that party to amend
the initial pleading. (Code Civ. Proc., § 403.040, subd. (a).) If the motion is
made after the time for the plaintiff to amend the pleading, the motion may
only be granted if (1) the case is incorrectly classified; and (2) the
plaintiff shows good cause for not seeking reclassification earlier. (Code Civ.
Proc., § 403.040, subd. (b).)
The initial time for Plaintiff to amend the pleadings having
passed, Plaintiff must show both that the case is incorrectly classified and
that it has good cause for not moving to reclassify earlier. In Walker v. Superior Court (1991) 53
Cal.3d 257, 262, the California Supreme Court held that a matter may be
reclassified from unlimited to limited only if it appears to a legal
certainty that the plaintiff's damages will necessarily be less than $25,000. (Walker
v. Superior Court (1991) 53 Cal.3d 257.) In Ytuarte v. Superior Court (2005)
129 Cal.App.4th 266, 278, the Court of Appeals examined the principles it set
forth in Walker and held that
“the court should reject the plaintiff's effort to reclassify the action as
unlimited only when the lack of jurisdiction as an “unlimited” case is certain
and clear.” (Id. at 279.)
Nevertheless, the plaintiff must present evidence to demonstrate a possibility
that the damages will exceed $25,000.00 and the trial court must review the
record to determine “whether a judgment in excess of $25,000.00 is obtainable.”
(Ibid.)
Plaintiff presents evidence that when this action was filed
the damages were within the jurisdiction of this Court but as assessments and
fees have accrued over time, its damages now exceed $25,000.00. (Motion,
Canfield Decl., ¶¶2-3.) This evidence, which is unopposed, demonstrates both
good cause for the timing of this Motion and that Plaintiff has a possibility
of damages that will exceed the amount in controversy allowed in the limited
jurisdiction Court.
Conclusion
Plaintiff’s Motion
to Reclassify Action is GRANTED. THIS CASE IS RECLASSIFIED AS AN UNLIMITED
CIVIL CASE AND TRANSFERRED TO THE RECLASSIFICATION/TRANSFER DESK FOR COLLECTION
OF FEES AND REASSIGNMENT TO AN INDEPENDENT CALENDAR COURT. PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE
RECLASSIFICATION FEE WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS OF THIS ORDER.
Moving party to give notice.