Judge: Mark H. Epstein, Case: 19STCV03450, Date: 2023-01-20 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 19STCV03450    Hearing Date: January 20, 2023    Dept: R

The court does not understand the motion.  In a prior order, the court imposed sanctions of $2000.  They are unpaid.  Defendant seeks an order to enforce the sanctions.  The order stands—there is no need for an enforcement order.  If defendant is suggesting that some further order is needed to allow defendant to collect, that is not in the motion.  If defendant is seeking some other non-monetary sanction, that is not in the motion either.

Because the court does not understand the relief defendant here seeks, the unopposed motion is DENIED.  However, if defendant is able to better explain the need for the proposed order, the court will consider the explanation.