Judge: Mark H. Epstein, Case: 22SMCV01553, Date: 2022-10-28 Tentative Ruling

The Court generally uploads tentative rulings the morning of the hearing.  Because of that, the parties cannot submit on the tentative the night before and not appear.  However, if after reviewing the tentative ruling ALL COUNSEL submit, they should tell the Court's judicial assistant when checking in and the Court will endeavor to either not hear the case in light of the submission or, if the Court believes that a hearing is still needed for some other reason, then the Court will be inclined to give priority.

In some cases, tentative rulings may be given by email the morning of the hearing rather than on the tentative ruling site.  Please check your email if you have not seen the tentative.  The email is generally sent to the persons who have signed up for a remote hearing.

For those appearing in the courtroom, the Court will provide a hard copy of the tentative ruling. 


Case Number: 22SMCV01553    Hearing Date: October 28, 2022    Dept: R

The Court is quite concerned.  Defendant seeks to vacate a default entered against him, which has led to issuance of a writ of possession and an imminent eviction.  Defendant’s statement as to why no answer was filed was that he and plaintiff’s counsel were in settlement discussions and plaintiff promised that no judgment would be entered while talks were ongoing.  Defendant submitted an email from plaintiff’s counsel dated September 15, 2022, that says precisely that.  According to defendant, talks remained ongoing as late as October 20, 2022.  However, on September 20, 2022, a judgment was entered and a writ issued.

 The Court is therefore inclined to WITHDRAW THE WRIT OF POSSESSION forthwith and VACATE THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT.  The matter will then be set for hearing.  The Court wants to give plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel an opportunity to present a response to these allegations.  If no reasonable response is forthcoming, then the case will be DISMISSED.  Other actions may be taken.  On the other hand, if there is a reasonable response then the default judgment will be reinstated and the writ re-issued.  This could be nothing more than a misunderstanding, which is what the Court hopes is the case.  If so, the Court will make an appropriate order.