Judge: Mark H. Epstein, Case: 24SMCV05483, Date: 2025-04-02 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 24SMCV05483    Hearing Date: April 2, 2025    Dept: I

The court will discuss this.  According to the declaration of diligence, the security guard at the complex (who is the individual who was sub-served) stated that the defendant had moved and no longer lived at the complex.  While plaintiff may not believe the guard’s statement is true, the court will not assume as much.  The court needs to know that the defendant was served properly before it will issue a writ of attachment.