Judge: Mark H. Epstein, Case: SC127208, Date: 2023-04-14 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: SC127208    Hearing Date: April 14, 2023    Dept: R

The court will discuss this issue with counsel.  The court is quite troubled at the repeated assurances provided by plaintiffs that they would stipulate to a continuance in return for additional time to respond to discovery.  (The court is not sure plaintiffs have yet responded to discovery fully.)  Yet when the time came to do so, plaintiffs changed direction and insisted on no continuance, then a 90 day continuance, then a 30 day continuance, and now a 90 day continuance again.  The court is far from sure that even a November trial date is feasible given the repeated discovery extensions requested by plaintiffs.

The court was of a mind to continue the case to May, 2024, which is when the court’s trial calendar largely opens up somewhat.  However, the court will discuss this with counsel.  There is a hint that plaintiffs’ medical condition is at the root of the issue, and if the problem is there is a medical reason for her to now oppose a longer continuance, the court will certainly bear that in mind.

The court also notes, however, that to the extent holding the trial in California is part of the problem, it is a problem of plaintiffs’ making.  Defendants have been trying to move the case since its inception.  It is unclear whether plaintiffs can be heard now to argue that trying the case in California poses a hardship.