Judge: Matthew C. Braner, Case: 37-2022-00014349-CU-MM-CTL, Date: 2023-11-17 Tentative Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,

DEPT.:

EVENT DATE:

EVENT TIME:

HALL OF JUSTICE

TENTATIVE RULINGS - November 16, 2023

11/17/2023  09:00:00 AM  C-60 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

JUDICIAL OFFICER:Matthew C. Braner

CASE NO.:

CASE CATEGORY:

EVENT TYPE:

CASE TITLE: CASE TYPE:

Civil - Unlimited  Medical Malpractice Summary Judgment / Summary Adjudication (Civil) 37-2022-00014349-CU-MM-CTL CASTILLO VS. CONCENTRA PRIMARY CARE OF CALIFORNIA [IMAGED] CAUSAL DOCUMENT/DATE FILED:

Defendant Occupational Health Centers of California, a Medical Corporation ('OHCC')'s motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative summary adjudication, is DENIED.

The court will hear from Plaintiff regarding the lack of an opposition to Defendant Cristian Santizo, M.D.'s motion.

In professional malpractice cases such as this, 'expert opinion testimony is required to prove or disprove that the defendant performed in accordance with the prevailing standard of care [citation], except in cases where the negligence is obvious to laymen.' (Kelley v. Trunk (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 519, 523; see also Johnson v. Superior Court (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 297, 305.) 'When a defendant moves for summary judgment and supports his motion with expert declarations that his conduct fell within the community standard of care, he is entitled to summary judgment unless the plaintiff comes forward with conflicting expert evidence.' (Hanson v. Grode (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 601, 607.) Here, Defendant OHCC presents the expert declarations of Dr. Ryan M. Klein and James Dagostino, DPT, PT, to support its motion. Dr. Klein is a medical doctor with over 25 years of experience and is currently provides primary and pulmonary care at the Hospitals for Affiliated Doctors of Orange County and for the Huntington Beach Internal Medical Group. Mr. Dagostino has been providing physical therapy since 1974, including at Sharp Rehabilitation Center, Bay General Community Hospital, and North County Health Center. For purposes of summary judgment, Dr. Klein and Mr. Dagostino appear qualified to offer expert testimony in relation to Plaintiff's claims.

As a qualified expert, Dr. Klein opines that, to a reasonable degree of medical probability, Defendant Santizo complied with the standard of care at all times in rendering care Plaintiff Christopher Castillo. Dr.

Klein opines that Defendant Santizo appropriately treated Plaintiff at the initial February 10, 2021 visit by physically examining his left ankle and right knee and ordering an x-ray, and that the standard of care did not require Defendant Santizo to perform a Thompson test or order an MRI on that date. Dr. Klein further opines that Defendant Santizo's follow-up treatment on February 12, 2021 and February 18, 2021 was within the standard of care, including ordering an MRI on February 18 to evaluate the potential for an Achilles tear, and the standard of care did not require Defendant Santizo to halt physical therapy after February 18 or after February 26, 2021. Defendant Santizo also met the standard of care by placing a STAT order on March 5, 2021, when the MRI results became available showing that Plaintiff had a ruptured Achilles tendon. Dr. Klein also opines that, to a reasonable degree of medical probability, Defendant Santizo's care did not cause the injuries claimed by Plaintiff, as he did not cause the Achilles injury, an earlier diagnosis of the injury would not have impacted the successful surgical correction of the Calendar No.: Event ID:  TENTATIVE RULINGS

3007967  21 CASE NUMBER: CASE TITLE:  CASTILLO VS. CONCENTRA PRIMARY CARE OF CALIFORNIA  37-2022-00014349-CU-MM-CTL tendon, and the continued physical therapy did not convert the purported tear into a rupture. Similarly, Dr. Klein opines that the physical therapy care provided to Plaintiff by Defendant OHCC's staff did not fall below the standard of care and was not, to a reasonable degree of medical probability, a substantial factor in causing injury to Plaintiff.

In opposition, Plaintiffs Christopher and Anne Castillo present the expert declaration of Dr. William Winternitz. Dr. Winternitz is an experienced, board-certified orthopedic surgeon specializing in orthopedic sports medicine. Dr. Winternitz appears qualified to offer expert testimony in relation to Plaintiff's claims; in that regard, the court denied Defendant's foundation objections based on his expert qualifications. Dr. Winternitz opines that, to a reasonable degree of medical probability, Defendant OHCC provided care that fell below the standard of care. More specifically, Dr. Winternitz opines that Defendant Santizo should have performed a Thompson test or other appropriate test on February 10, 2021 to properly diagnose an Achilles tendon tear, and that ordering weight bearing physical therapy while failing to provide a walking boot significantly stressed the tendon, causing it to rupture and require surgery. According to Dr. Winternitz, had Defendant OHCC's employees complied with the standard of care, surgery would not have been needed.

The court concludes these competing expert declarations are sufficient to raise a triable issue of material fact on Plaintiff's causes of action against Defendant OHCC as to compliance with the standard of care and causation.

Accordingly, Defendant OHCC's motion is denied.

Calendar No.: Event ID:  TENTATIVE RULINGS

3007967  21