Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 19STCV37608, Date: 2023-03-29 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19STCV37608 Hearing Date: March 29, 2023 Dept: 54
|
Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles |
|||
|
Pengbo
Wang, et al., |
Plaintiffs, |
Case No.: |
19STCV37608 |
|
vs. |
|
Tentative
Ruling |
|
|
Megan
Elizabeth Anne Friedman, D.O., et al., |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: March 29, 2023
Department
54, Judge Maurice A. Leiter
Petition
for Minor’s Compromise
Moving
Party: Minor
Plaintiff Qinghe Zhou
Responding
Party: None
T/R: THE
PETITION IS GRANTED.
PLAINTIFFS
TO NOTICE.
If the
parties wish to submit on the tentative, please email the courtroom at¿SMCdept54@lacourt.org¿with notice to opposing counsel (or self-represented party)
before 8:00 am on the day of the hearing.
The Court considers the petition.
No opposition has been received.
Compromises of disputed claims brought by minors are governed in part by
CCP § 372. The statute allows a guardian ad litem to appear in court on behalf
of a minor claimant and gives the guardian ad litem the power to compromise the
minor’s claim “with the approval of the court in which the action or proceeding
is pending.” A petition for court
approval of a compromise must be verified by the petitioner and must contain a
full disclosure of all information that has any bearing upon the reasonableness
of the compromise or covenant. (CRC Rule
7.950.)
CRC Rule 7.952(a) requires the attendance of the petitioner and claimant
at the hearing on the compromise of the claim unless the court for good causes
dispenses with their personal appearance.
“Neither section 372 nor the California Rules of Court (rules 7.950
& 7.952) contemplates a noticed motion and adversary hearing when court
approval of a minor's compromise is sought. Although we need not decide the
question, it would appear that a petition to approve or disapprove a minor's
compromise may be decided by the superior court, ex parte, in chambers.” (Pearson
v. Superior Court (2012) 202 Cal. App. 4th 1333, 1337.)
Minor Plaintiff moves for approval of a settlement with Defendants Yao Weng Hsu, M.D.,
Healthcare Pros. Inc., and White Memorial Medical Center. Minor claimant
would receive $90,000.00 out of a total settlement of $2,910,000.00. Attorneys’
fees of $13,179.00 and costs of $2,140.00 will be deducted from the minor
claimant’s settlement amounts. Minor
claimant’s net proceeds are $74,681.00. The settlement funds will be placed in
an insured account with Court approval for withdrawals.
The individual settlement is fair in light alleged injuries sustained by
claimant. The petition is GRANTED.