Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 20STCV16551, Date: 2023-03-21 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV16551 Hearing Date: March 21, 2023 Dept: 54
|
Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles |
|||
|
Bridget
Bo-Lane, |
Plaintiff, |
Case No.: |
20STCV16551 |
|
vs. |
|
Tentative
Ruling |
|
|
Quest Diagnostic, Inc., |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: March 21, 2023
Department
54, Judge Maurice A. Leiter
Motion
to Be Relieved as Counsel
Moving
Party: Robert R. Shiri, Esq., counsel of record for Plaintiff
Bridget Bo-Lane
Responding
Party: None
T/R: THE MOTION IS GRANTED. COUNSEL TO FILE
PROOF OF SERVICE OF ORDER ON PLAINTIFF WITHIN 5 DAYS OF NOTICE OF RULING.
COUNSEL WILL BE RELIEVED UPON FILING OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF ORDER.
COUNSEL
TO NOTICE.
The Court considers the moving papers. No opposition has been
received.
The Court may issue an order allowing
an attorney to withdraw from representation, after notice to the client. (CCP § 284.)
The attorney may withdraw from representation as long as the withdrawal
would not result in undue prejudice to the client’s interest—i.e., counsel
cannot withdraw at a critical point in the litigation. (Ramirez
v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal. App. 4th 904, 915; see California Rule of
Professional Conduct 3-700.)
Robert R. Shiri, counsel of record for
Plaintiff Bridget Bo-Lane seeks to withdraw from representation of Plaintiff.
Counsel states that the attorney-client relationship has been compromised. No
prejudice will result from counsel’s withdrawal. Counsel has complied with CRC
3.1362.
There is good cause for counsel’s
withdrawal. The motion is GRANTED.