Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 20STCV44565, Date: 2023-02-10 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV44565 Hearing Date: February 10, 2023 Dept: 54
|
Superior Court
of California County of Los
Angeles |
|||
|
Maria Cardozo, et al., |
Plaintiffs, |
Case No.: |
20STCV44565 |
|
vs. |
|
Tentative Ruling |
|
|
Kamran Tavakoli, et al., |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: February 10, 2023
Department 54, Judge Maurice Leiter
Motion to Set Aside Dismissal
Moving Party: Defendants/Cross-Complainants
Kamran Tavakoli, Sharona Arastoozad Tavakoli and Bonnie Brae St 26, LLC
Responding Party: Plaintiffs
Maria Cardozo, Julio Garcia and Valeria Garcia.
T/R: CROSS-COMPLAINANTS’ MOTION TO SET ASIDE
DISMISSAL IS GRANTED.
CROSS-COMPLAINANTS TO NOTICE.
If the parties wish to submit on the tentative,
please email the courtroom at¿SMCdept54@lacourt.org¿with notice
to opposing counsel (or self-represented party) before 8:00 am on the day of
the hearing.
The Court considers the moving papers and opposition.
CCP § 473(d) provides, in pertinent part, “[t]he court
may…on motion of either party after notice to the other party, set aside any
void judgment or order.”
Defendants/Cross-Complainants
move to set aside dismissal of their cross-complaint against Cross-Defendant
Jose Casteneda on the ground that their former counsel filed a request for
dismissal without their consent.
A
request for dismissal of the cross-complaint was filed on September 21, 2021.
On September 13, 2022, Cross-Complainants’ former counsel, Demler,
Armstrong, & Rowland, LLP, was relieved per a court order.
Cross-Complainant Kamran Tavakoli declares that Tavakoli did not consent to the
dismissal and did not learn of the dismissal until December 2022 while
preparing for Defendant Bonnie Brae St 26, LLC’s deposition. (Decl. Tavakoli ¶
9.)
In
opposition, Plaintiffs assert that Tavakoli’s declaration is insufficient to
establish Demler did not have authority to request dismissal. The Court
disagrees. Tavakoli has submitted a declaration under the penalty of perjury
and Plaintiffs provide no reason to suspect Tavakoli’s statements are untrue.
Cross-Complainants’
motion to set aside dismissal is GRANTED.