Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 21STCV36928, Date: 2023-03-10 Tentative Ruling



Case Number: 21STCV36928    Hearing Date: March 10, 2023    Dept: 54

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

 

Jose Mata Hernandez, et al.,

 

 

 

Plaintiffs,

 

Case No.:

 

 

21STCV36928

 

vs.

 

 

Tentative Ruling

 

 

JAC Burbank Properties, LLC, et al.,

 

 

 

Defendants.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hearing Date: March 10, 2023

Department 54, Judge Maurice A. Leiter

(2) Petitions for Minor’s Compromise

Moving Party: Minor Plaintiffs

Responding Party: None

 

T/R:     THE PETITION ARE GRANTED.

 

            PLAINTIFFS TO NOTICE.

 

If the parties wish to submit on the tentative, please email the courtroom at¿SMCdept54@lacourt.org¿with notice to opposing counsel (or self-represented party) before 8:00 am on the day of the hearing. 

 

The Court considers the petitions.  No opposition has been received.

 

Compromises of disputed claims brought by minors are governed in part by CCP § 372. The statute allows a guardian ad litem to appear in court on behalf of a minor claimant and gives the guardian ad litem the power to compromise the minor’s claim “with the approval of the court in which the action or proceeding is pending.”  A petition for court approval of a compromise must be verified by the petitioner and must contain a full disclosure of all information that has any bearing upon the reasonableness of the compromise or covenant.  (CRC Rule 7.950.)

 

CRC Rule 7.952(a) requires the attendance of the petitioner and claimant at the hearing on the compromise of the claim unless the court for good causes dispenses with their personal appearance.

 

“Neither section 372 nor the California Rules of Court (rules 7.950 & 7.952) contemplates a noticed motion and adversary hearing when court approval of a minor's compromise is sought. Although we need not decide the question, it would appear that a petition to approve or disapprove a minor's compromise may be decided by the superior court, ex parte, in chambers.”  (Pearson v. Superior Court (2012) 202 Cal. App. 4th 1333, 1337.) 

 

Petitioners seeks court approval for a settlement from Defendant JAC Burbank Properties, LLC under which minor Plaintiffs would each receive $5,000.00 out of a total settlement of $70,000.00.  Attorneys’ fees of $1,250.00 and costs of $688.99 will be deducted from the minor claimants’ settlement amounts.  Minor claimants’ net proceeds are $3,061.01 each. The settlement funds will be delivered to the claimants’ parents.

 

This is a landlord-tenant action involving allegations of uninhabitable conditions.   The individual settlements are fair in light of alleged injuries sustained by claimants. The attorney’s fees are reasonable.