Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 21STCV43430, Date: 2025-05-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV43430 Hearing Date: May 28, 2025 Dept: 54
Superior
Court of California County
of Los Angeles |
|||
Joel Bernknopf, et al., |
Plaintiffs, |
Case No.: |
21STCV43430 |
vs. |
|
Tentative Ruling |
|
Brian M. Cronin, et al., |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: May 28, 2025
Department 54, Judge Maurice A. Leiter
Motion for Assignment Order
Moving Party: Plaintiffs/Judgment Creditors Joel
Bernknopf and John Lamorte
Responding Party: None
T/R: JUDGMENT
CREDITORS’ MOTION IS GRANTED.
JUDGMENT CREDITORS TO NOTICE.
If the parties wish to submit on the
tentative, please email the courtroom at SMCdept54@lacourt.org with notice to opposing counsel
(or self-represented party) before 8:00 am on the day of the hearing.
The Court considers the moving papers.
No opposition has been received.
Code Civ. Proc. § 708.510(a) provides
for assignment orders and states:
(a) Except as otherwise provided by law, upon application of the
judgment creditor on noticed motion, the court may order the judgment debtor to
assign to the judgment creditor or to a receiver appointed pursuant to Article
7 (commencing with Section 708.610) all or part of a right to payment due or to
become due, whether or not the right is conditioned on future developments,
including but not limited to the following types of payments: (1) wages due
from the federal government that are not subject to withholding under an
earnings withholding order. (2) Rents. (3) Commissions. (4) Royalties. (5)
Payments due from a patent or copyright. (6) Insurance policy loan value.
A court may take into consideration all
relevant factors in determining whether to issue an assignment order, and the
only constraints placed on the court are that the right to payment be assigned
only to the extent necessary to satisfy the creditor’s money judgment and that,
where part of the payments are exempt, the amount of payments assigned should
not exceed the difference between the gross amount of the payments and the exempt
amount. (CCP §§ 708.510 (c), (d) (e) and (f).) The burden is on the debtor to
show that an exemption applies. (CCP § 703.580(b).)
Plaintiffs/Judgment Creditors move for
an order assigning the interests of Judgment Debtors ARC-V, Inc. and
ARC-IV, LLC. in two promissory notes entered into between ARC-V, Inc. and
Hanger Prosthetics & Orthotics, Inc., and ARC-IV, LLC and Hanger
Prosthetics & Orthotics, Inc., and all rights to payment thereunder, to the
Judgment Creditors to the extent necessary to pay the Judgment Creditors’
Judgment entered in this action in full, including accrued interest through the
date of payment. The promissory notes are for the sale of Defendants’ assets. Defendants have not opposed this
motion to show that an exemption applies.
Plaintiffs/Judgment Creditors have
shown entitlement to assignment of payments generated from Defendants’ business
activities. The motion is GRANTED.