Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 22STCV00038, Date: 2024-01-25 Tentative Ruling



Case Number: 22STCV00038    Hearing Date: April 12, 2024    Dept: 54

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

 

Kevin Cargill, et al.,

 

 

 

Plaintiffs,

 

Case No.:

 

 

22STCV00038

 

vs.

 

 

Tentative Ruling

 

 

Farcoh 126 LLC,

 

 

 

Defendants.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hearing Date: April 12, 2024

Department 54, Judge Maurice A. Leiter

Petition for Minor’s Compromise

Moving Party: Minor Plaintiff Kailee Cargill

Responding Party: None

 

T/R:      THE PETITION IS GRANTED.

 

PLAINTIFFS TO NOTICE.

 

If the parties wish to submit on the tentative, please email the courtroom at SMCdept54@lacourt.org with notice to opposing counsel (or self-represented party) before 8:00 am on the day of the hearing. 

 

The Court considers the petition.  No opposition has been received.

 

Compromises of disputed claims brought by minors are governed in part by CCP § 372. The statute allows a guardian ad litem to appear in court on behalf of a minor claimant and gives the guardian ad litem the power to compromise the minor’s claim “with the approval of the court in which the action or proceeding is pending.”  A petition for court approval of a compromise must be verified by the petitioner and must contain a full disclosure of all information that has any bearing upon the reasonableness of the compromise or covenant.  (CRC Rule 7.950.)

 

CRC Rule 7.952(a) requires the attendance of the petitioner and claimant at the hearing on the compromise of the claim unless the court for good causes dispenses with their personal appearance.

 

“Neither section 372 nor the California Rules of Court (rules 7.950 & 7.952) contemplates a noticed motion and adversary hearing when court approval of a minor's compromise is sought. Although we need not decide the question, it would appear that a petition to approve or disapprove a minor's compromise may be decided by the superior court, ex parte, in chambers.”  (Pearson v. Superior Court (2012) 202 Cal. App. 4th 1333, 1337.) 

 

Minor Plaintiff moves for approval of a settlement with Defendants Farcoh 126 LLC, Joseph Cohen, and Rescap Securities Holdings, Co. in which minor claimant would receive $5,000.00 out of a total settlement of $295,000.00. No attorney’s fees or costs will be deducted from the minor claimant’s settlement amounts.  Minor claimant’s net proceeds are $5,000.00. The proceeds will be placed in a blocked account.

 

This is a landlord-tenant action. Having reviewed the petition, the Court finds that the individual settlement is fair in light of the alleged injuries sustained by claimant.

 

The petition is GRANTED.