Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 22STCV00038, Date: 2024-01-25 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV00038 Hearing Date: April 12, 2024 Dept: 54
|
Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles |
|||
|
Kevin Cargill, et al., |
Plaintiffs, |
Case No.: |
22STCV00038 |
|
vs. |
|
Tentative Ruling |
|
|
Farcoh 126 LLC, |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date:
April 12, 2024
Department 54,
Judge Maurice A. Leiter
Petition for
Minor’s Compromise
Moving Party: Minor
Plaintiff Kailee Cargill
Responding
Party: None
T/R: THE PETITION IS GRANTED.
PLAINTIFFS TO NOTICE.
If the parties
wish to submit on the tentative, please email the courtroom at SMCdept54@lacourt.org with notice to opposing
counsel (or self-represented party) before 8:00 am on the day of the
hearing.
The Court considers the petition. No opposition has been received.
Compromises of disputed claims brought by minors are governed in part by
CCP § 372. The statute allows a guardian ad litem to appear in court on behalf
of a minor claimant and gives the guardian ad litem the power to compromise the
minor’s claim “with the approval of the court in which the action or proceeding
is pending.” A petition for court
approval of a compromise must be verified by the petitioner and must contain a
full disclosure of all information that has any bearing upon the reasonableness
of the compromise or covenant. (CRC Rule
7.950.)
CRC Rule 7.952(a) requires the attendance of the petitioner and claimant
at the hearing on the compromise of the claim unless the court for good causes
dispenses with their personal appearance.
“Neither section 372 nor the California Rules of Court (rules 7.950
& 7.952) contemplates a noticed motion and adversary hearing when court
approval of a minor's compromise is sought. Although we need not decide the
question, it would appear that a petition to approve or disapprove a minor's
compromise may be decided by the superior court, ex parte, in chambers.” (Pearson v. Superior Court (2012) 202
Cal. App. 4th 1333, 1337.)
Minor Plaintiff moves for approval of a settlement with Defendants
Farcoh 126 LLC, Joseph Cohen, and Rescap Securities Holdings, Co. in which
minor claimant would receive $5,000.00 out of a total settlement of
$295,000.00. No attorney’s fees or costs will be deducted from the minor
claimant’s settlement amounts. Minor
claimant’s net proceeds are $5,000.00. The proceeds will be placed in a blocked
account.
This is a landlord-tenant action. Having reviewed the petition, the
Court finds that the individual settlement is fair in light of the alleged
injuries sustained by claimant.
The petition is GRANTED.