Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 22STCV00738, Date: 2023-08-25 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV00738 Hearing Date: April 3, 2024 Dept: 54
|
Superior
Court of California County of
Los Angeles |
|||
|
Stephanie Marie Wickstrom, et al., |
Plaintiffs, |
Case No.: |
22STCV00738 |
|
vs. |
|
Tentative Ruling |
|
|
Southern California Edison Company,
et al., |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: April 3, 2024
Department 54, Judge Maurice A. Leiter
(2) Petitions for Minor’s Compromise
Moving Party: Minor Plaintiffs
Responding Party: None
T/R: THE PETITIONS ARE GRANTED.
PLAINTIFFS TO NOTICE.
If the parties wish to submit on the tentative, please
email the courtroom at SMCdept54@lacourt.org with
notice to opposing counsel (or self-represented party) before 8:00 am on the
day of the hearing.
The Court considers the moving papers.
No opposition has been received.
Compromises of disputed claims brought by
minors are governed in part by CCP § 372. The statute allows a guardian ad
litem to appear in court on behalf of a minor claimant and gives the guardian
ad litem the power to compromise the minor’s claim “with the approval of the
court in which the action or proceeding is pending.” A petition for court approval of a compromise
must be verified by the petitioner and must contain a full disclosure of all
information that has any bearing upon the reasonableness of the compromise or
covenant. (CRC Rule 7.950.)
CRC Rule 7.952(a) requires the
attendance of the petitioner and claimant at the hearing on the compromise of
the claim unless the court for good causes dispenses with their personal
appearance.
“Neither section 372 nor the California
Rules of Court (rules 7.950 & 7.952) contemplates a noticed motion and
adversary hearing when court approval of a minor's compromise is sought.
Although we need not decide the question, it would appear that a petition to
approve or disapprove a minor's compromise may be decided by the superior
court, ex parte, in chambers.” (Pearson
v. Superior Court (2012) 202 Cal. App. 4th 1333, 1337.)
Petitioners seek court approval for a
settlement from Defendants Southern California Edison Company and New Legend,
Inc., under which the two minor claimants would receive 20% of the total
settlement. 33% in attorneys’ fees and 20% of total advanced costs will be
deducted from the minor claimants’ settlement amounts. The settlement funds
will be placed in a deferred annuity.
This is a wrongful death action. The
individual settlements are fair in light of the alleged injuries sustained by
claimants. The attorney’s fees and costs are reasonable.
The petitions are GRANTED.