Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 22STCV06085, Date: 2023-05-04 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV06085 Hearing Date: May 4, 2023 Dept: 54
|
Superior
Court of California County of
Los Angeles |
|||
|
Cartwright
Termite & Pest Control, Inc., |
Plaintiff, |
Case No.: |
22STCV06085 |
|
vs. |
|
Tentative Ruling |
|
|
Nisan Tepper, et al., |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: May 4, 2023
Department 54, Judge Maurice Leiter
Motion to Set Aside Default
Moving Party: Defendant Shmuel Erde
Responding Party: Plaintiff
Cartwright Termite & Pest Control, Inc.
T/R: DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
DEFENDANT TO NOTICE.
If the parties wish to submit on the tentative, please email
the courtroom at¿SMCdept54@lacourt.org¿with notice to opposing counsel (or self-represented party)
before 8:00 am on the day of the hearing.
The Court considers the moving papers, opposition, and
reply.
CCP § 473(b) provides, in pertinent part, “[t]he court
may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal
representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken
against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or
excusable neglect.”
Defendant Erde, who substituted in for defaulted
Defendant 4276 Crenshaw
Investment LLC (“Crenshaw”) on March 29, 2023, moves to set aside default
against Crenshaw. Default was entered against Crenshaw on April 14, 2022. Erde
represents he did not know of the default until February 10, 2023.
Erde
asserts that entry of default should be vacated because Crenshaw was not
properly served with the complaint. The
registered agent for Crenshaw was served with the complaint by substitute
service on February 24, 2022. Erde
cites to the proof of service, which shows substitute service on “John Doe, Employee
PMB (Male/30/African American/6'0"/200/browneyes/black hair.)” Erde
concludes that this service was improper but provides no explanation or
analysis showing why service was improper. The Court cannot set aside default
on these grounds.
Defendant’s
motion to set aside default is DENIED without prejudice.