Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 22STCV08701, Date: 2024-05-13 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV08701 Hearing Date: May 13, 2024 Dept: 54
|
Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles |
|||
|
Moonlight Construction, Inc., |
Plaintiff, |
Case No.:
|
22STCV08701 |
|
vs. |
|
Tentative Ruling
|
|
|
Rufus G. Thayer, III, et al., |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: May 13, 2024
Department 54, Judge Maurice A. Leiter
Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel
Moving Party: Ropers, Majeski
PC, counsel of record for Cross-Defendants
Moonlight Construction, Ben Nino Hunter, and Moran Elkarif
Responding Party: None
T/R: THE MOTION IS GRANTED. COUNSEL TO FILE
PROOF OF SERVICE OF ORDER ON CROSS-DEFENDANTS WITHIN 5 DAYS OF NOTICE OF
RULING. COUNSEL WILL BE RELIEVED UPON FILING OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF ORDER.
COUNSEL TO NOTICE.
The Court considers the moving papers.
No opposition has been received.
The Court may issue an order allowing
an attorney to withdraw from representation, after notice to the client. (CCP § 284.)
The attorney may withdraw from representation where the withdrawal would
not result in undue prejudice to the client’s interest—for example, counsel
cannot withdraw at a critical point in the litigation. (Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal.
App. 4th 904, 915; see California Rule of Professional Conduct 3-700.)
Ropers, Majeski PC seeks
to withdraw from representation of Cross-Defendants Moonlight Construction, Ben
Nino Hunter, and Moran Elkarif. Counsel states that there is a conflict of
interest requiring withdrawal. The Court’s record reflects the parties have
settled the action. No prejudice will result from counsel’s withdrawal. Counsel
has complied with CRC 3.1362.
There is good cause for counsel’s withdrawal. The motion is GRANTED.