Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 22STCV17343, Date: 2025-04-01 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV17343 Hearing Date: April 1, 2025 Dept: 54
|
Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles |
|||
|
Ezor Arthur Edward, |
Plaintiff, |
Case No.: |
22STCV17343 |
|
vs. |
|
Tentative Ruling |
|
|
Jose Jaime, et al., |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: April 1, 2025
Department 54, Judge Maurice Leiter
Motion to Dismiss
Moving Party: Defendants Jose Jaime and Dagelberto
Jaime
Responding Party: None
T/R: DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED.
DEFENDANTS TO NOTICE.
If the parties wish to submit on the tentative,
please email the courtroom at SMCdept54@lacourt.org with notice to opposing counsel (or
self-represented party) before 8:00 am on the day of the hearing.
The Court considers the moving papers.
No opposition has been received.
Defendants move to dismiss this action.
Defendants, in a one paragraph brief, state that Plaintiff claimed unpaid rent
for August 2018 and September 2018 despite having sold the property in June
2018. Defendants provide no other analysis or argument. The Court cannot
consider these materials on a motion to dismiss, which is limited to the
allegations of the complaint and matters of which the Court can take judicial
notice. Additionally, there is no proof of service attached to the motion,
showing that it was properly served on Plaintiff.
The Court also notes that Defendants are still
in default. They must seek to set aside the default before the Court can
address substantive motions.
Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED.