Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 22STCV18856, Date: 2022-10-10 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV18856 Hearing Date: October 10, 2022 Dept: 54
|
Superior Court
of California County of Los
Angeles |
|||
|
Tyetta Tilmon, et al., |
Plaintiffs, |
Case No.: |
22STCV18856 |
|
vs. |
|
Tentative Ruling |
|
|
Danstrull. L.P., |
Defendant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: October
10, 2022
Department 54, Judge Maurice A. Leiter
Motion for Trial Preference
Moving Party:
Minor Plaintiffs
Responding Party:
Defendant Danstrull, L.P.
T/R: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR TRIAL PREFERENCE IS
GRANTED.
PLAINTIFFS
TO NOTICE.
If the parties wish to submit on the tentative, please email
the courtroom at¿SMCdept54@lacourt.org¿with
notice to opposing counsel (or self-represented party) before 8:00 am on the
day of the hearing.
The
Court considers the moving papers, opposition, and reply.
CCP § 36(b) provides, “[a]
civil action to recover damages for wrongful death or personal injury shall be
entitled to preference upon the motion of any party to the action who is under
14 years of age unless the court finds that the party does not have a
substantial interest in the case as a whole.”
The three minor Plaintiffs,
who range in age from 2 to 10 years old, move for trial preference. This is a
landlord-tenant action. Plaintiffs assert Defendants failed to maintain their
rental units, resulting in insect infestations, mold, and inoperable appliances
and utilities. Plaintiffs allegedly suffered from respiratory distress and
nausea.
In opposition, Defendant
argues that the minor Plaintiffs do not have a substantial interest in the case
because they are not parties to the lease and have not suffered any “grievous”
injury. This argument is unpersuasive. The minor Plaintiffs have a substantial
interest in this case because they occupied the subject rentals and allegedly suffered
injury. The Court cannot find, based on the record before it, that the injuries
of the minor Plaintiffs are so trivial that the minors do not have a
substantial interest in the case.
The Court denies Defendant’s
request, made in their opposition, to sever the claims of the minor Plaintiffs.
The motion is GRANTED.