Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 22STCV18856, Date: 2023-05-23 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV18856 Hearing Date: May 23, 2023 Dept: 54
|
Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles |
|||
|
Tyetta
Tilmon, et al., |
Plaintiffs, |
Case No.: |
22STCV18856 |
|
vs. |
|
Tentative
Ruling |
|
|
Danstrull,
L.P., |
Defendant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: May 23, 2023
Department
54, Judge Maurice A. Leiter
(2)
Petitions for Minor’s Compromise
Moving
Party: Minor
Plaintiffs
Responding
Party: None
T/R: THE
PETITIONS ARE GRANTED.
PLAINTIFFS
TO NOTICE.
If the
parties wish to submit on the tentative, please email the courtroom at¿SMCdept54@lacourt.org¿with notice to opposing counsel (or self-represented party)
before 8:00 am on the day of the hearing.
The Court considers the petitions.
No opposition has been received.
Compromises of disputed claims brought by minors are governed in part by
CCP § 372. The statute allows a guardian ad litem to appear in court on
behalf of a minor claimant and gives the guardian ad litem the power to
compromise the minor’s claim “with the approval of the court in which the
action or proceeding is pending.” A
petition for court approval of a compromise must be verified by the petitioner
and must contain a full disclosure of all information that has any bearing upon
the reasonableness of the compromise or covenant. (CRC Rule 7.950.)
CRC Rule 7.952(a) requires the attendance of the petitioner and claimant
at the hearing on the compromise of the claim unless the court for good causes
dispenses with their personal appearance.
“Neither section 372 nor the California Rules of Court (rules 7.950
& 7.952) contemplates a noticed motion and adversary hearing when court
approval of a minor's compromise is sought. Although we need not decide the
question, it would appear that a petition to approve or disapprove a minor's
compromise may be decided by the superior court, ex parte, in chambers.” (Pearson
v. Superior Court (2012) 202 Cal. App. 4th 1333, 1337.)
Petitioners seeks court approval for a settlement from Defendant Danstrull, L.P pursuant to which minor Plaintiffs
each would receive $6,000.00 out of a total settlement of $99,000.00. Attorneys’ fees of $1,500.00 and costs of
$82.42 will be deducted from the minor claimants’ settlement amounts. Minor claimants’ net proceeds are $4,417.58
each. The settlement funds will placed in blocked accounts.
This is a landlord-tenant action involving allegations of uninhabitable
conditions. The individual settlements
are fair in light of alleged injuries sustained by claimants. The attorney’s
fees are reasonable.