Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 22STCV32445, Date: 2023-08-22 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV32445 Hearing Date: October 18, 2023 Dept: 54
|
Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles |
|||
|
Maria Esther Flores Prieto, |
Plaintiff, |
Case No.: |
22STCV32445 |
|
vs. |
|
Tentative Ruling |
|
|
Avfund Capital Group, Inc., et al., |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: October 18, 2023
Department 54, Judge Maurice Leiter
(2) Motions to Set Aside Default
Judgment
Moving Party: Defendants Avfund Capital Group, Inc.
and Raul Avila
Responding Party: Plaintiff Maria Esther Flores Prieto
T/R: DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO SET ASIDE
DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT ARE GRANTED
DEFENDANTS TO NOTICE.
If the parties wish to submit on the tentative, please
email the courtroom at SMCdept54@lacourt.org with
notice to opposing counsel (or self-represented party) before 8:00 am on the
day of the hearing.
The Court considers the moving papers
and opposition.
CCP § 473(b) provides, in pertinent
part, “[t]he court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his
or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other
proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence,
surprise, or excusable neglect.”
Defendants move to set aside default
and default judgment on the grounds of mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or
excusable neglect. Default was entered against Defendants on December 27, 2022.
Default judgment was entered against Defendants on March 15, 2023. Defendant Avila
declares that he did not receive actual notice of the complaint when it was
served by substitute service and instead learned of the case when default was
entered. Avila states that he believed court cases remained on hold due to the
COVID-19 pandemic. When default judgment was entered, Defendants hired an
attorney and filed this motion.
The Court will set aside default and
default judgment against Defendants. Defendants did not respond to the
complaint due to lack of notice and did not challenge the entry of default due
to mistake.
Defendants’ motions are GRANTED.