Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 23STCP02524, Date: 2023-09-14 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCP02524 Hearing Date: September 14, 2023 Dept: 54
|
Superior Court of California County
of Los Angeles |
|||
|
J.G. Wentworth Originations, LLC, |
Petitioner, |
Case No.: |
23STCP02524 |
|
In re: Majahne Williams, |
|
Tentative Ruling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: September
14, 2023
Department 54,
Judge Maurice A. Leiter
Petition for
Approval of Transfer of Structured Settlement Payment Rights
Moving Party: Petitioner J.G. Wentworth Originations, LLC
Responding
Party: None
T/R: THE PETITION
IS GRANTED.
THE PETITIONER TO NOTICE.
If the parties
wish to submit on the tentative, please email the courtroom at SMCdept54@lacourt.org with notice to opposing
counsel (or self-represented party) before 8:00 am on the day of the
hearing.
The Court considers the moving papers.
No opposition has been received.
Petitioner complies with the venue requirement under Insurance Code §
10139.5, subdivision (c)(1), as Payee resides in the County of Los
Angeles. (Decl. Williams ¶ 1.)
Insurance Code §
10139.5 provides that a direct or indirect transfer of structured settlement
payment rights is not effective unless the transfer has been approved in a
final court order based on certain express written findings by the Court. (Ins. Code, § 10139.5, subd.
(a)(1)-(6).) After review of the
petition, the Court fineds:
·
That the transfer is in the best interest of the Payee as
contemplated under Insurance Code section 10139.5, subd. (a)(1). (Decl. Williams
¶ 4.)
·
That under Section 10139.5, subd. (a)(2), Payee has been
advised in writing by Petitioner to seek independent professional advice
regarding the transfer and has either received that advice or knowingly waived
that advice in writing. (Id. ¶ 12.)
·
That under Section 10139.5, subd. (a)(3), Petitioner has
provided Payee with a disclosure form that complies with Section 10136 and the
transfer agreement complies with Sections 10136 and 10138. (Id. ¶ 13.)
·
That under Section 10139.5, subd. (a)(4), the transfer
does not contravene any applicable statute or the order of any court or other
government authority. (Petition,
generally.)
·
That under Section 10139.5, subd. (a)(5), Payee
reasonably understands the terms of the transfer agreement, including the terms
set forth in the disclosure statement required by Section 10136. (Decl. Williams
¶¶ 5.) Payee is transferring monthly payments of $300.00 each, commencing
11/2/2023 through and including 3/2/2030; monthly payments of $200.00 with a 3%
annual increase, commencing 4/2/2030 through and including 3/2/2052; monthly
payments of $994.90 with a 3% annual increase, commencing 4/2/2052 through and
including 3/2/2055 and monthly payments of $4,410.38 with a 3% annual increase,
commencing 4/2/2055 through and including 3/2/2060 in exchange for $44,000.00.
(Id.) The present value of the payment at the IRS discounted rate of 5% is $111,986.38.
Petitioner will pay Payee the present value of the payment at a discounted rate
of 10.09%, or $44,000.00.
·
That under Section 10139.5, subd. (a)(6), Payee
understands and does not wish to exercise the payee's right to cancel the
transfer agreement. (Id. ¶ 14.)
The Court finds that the transfer is fair, reasonable, and in the
payee's best interest. The petition is GRANTED.