Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 23STCV04037, Date: 2025-02-04 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV04037 Hearing Date: February 4, 2025 Dept: 54
|
Superior
Court of California County
of Los Angeles |
|||
|
Sheila Zacarias, et
al. |
Plaintiffs, |
Case No.: |
23STCV04037 |
|
vs. |
|
Tentative Ruling |
|
|
LIH
Harbor Magnolia LP, et al., |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: February
4, 2025
Department 54, Judge
Maurice A. Leiter
(3) Petitions for
Minor’s Compromise
Moving Party: Minor Plaintiffs
Responding Party: None
T/R: THE PETITIONS ARE GRANTED.
PLAINTIFFS TO NOTICE.
If the parties wish to
submit on the tentative, please email the courtroom at¿SMCdept54@lacourt.org¿with notice to opposing counsel (or
self-represented party) before 8:00 am on the day of the hearing.¿
The Court considers the
moving papers. No opposition has been received.
Compromises of disputed
claims brought by minors are governed in part by CCP § 372. The statute allows
a guardian ad litem to appear in court on behalf of a minor claimant and gives
the guardian ad litem the power to compromise the minor’s claim “with the
approval of the court in which the action or proceeding is pending.” A
petition for court approval of a compromise must be verified by the petitioner
and must contain a full disclosure of all information that has any bearing upon
the reasonableness of the compromise or covenant. (CRC Rule 7.950.)
CRC Rule 7.952(a)
requires the attendance of the petitioner and claimant at the hearing on the
compromise of the claim unless the court for good causes dispenses with their
personal appearance.
“Neither section 372 nor
the California Rules of Court (rules 7.950 & 7.952) contemplates a noticed
motion and adversary hearing when court approval of a minor's compromise is
sought. Although we need not decide the question, it would appear that a petition
to approve or disapprove a minor's compromise may be decided by the superior
court, ex parte, in chambers.” (Pearson v. Superior Court (2012)
202 Cal. App. 4th 1333, 1337.)
Petitioners seek court
approval for a settlement from Defendant LIH Harbor Magnolia LP under which the minor claimants would receive
$10,000.00 each, from a total settlement of $525,000.00. $2,451.75 in
attorneys’ fees and $193.01 in litigation costs will be deducted from the minor
claimants’ settlement amounts for a net settlement for $7,355.24. The
settlement funds will be placed in blocked accounts.
This is a landlord
tenant action involving allegations of uninhabitable conditions. The individual settlements are fair in light of
the alleged injuries sustained by claimants. The Court finds that the attorney’s
fees and costs are reasonable.
The petitions are
GRANTED.