Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 23STCV13330, Date: 2025-05-09 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV13330 Hearing Date: May 9, 2025 Dept: 54
|
Superior Court
of California County of Los
Angeles |
|||
|
Laura Spensley, |
Plaintiff, |
Case
No.: |
23STCV13330 |
|
vs. |
|
Tentative Ruling |
|
|
Yaniv Ben Ami, et al., |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: May 9, 2025
Department 54, Judge Maurice Leiter
Motion to be Relieved as Counsel
Moving Party: Jeffrey D. Nadel, counsel of record
for Defendants
Responding Party: Plaintiff Laura Spensley
T/R: THE MOTIONS TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL ARE CONTINUED
TO MAY 27, 2025 AT 9:00 AM.
DEFENDANTS TO NOTICE.
If the parties
wish to submit on the tentative, please email the courtroom at SMCdept54@lacourt.org with notice to opposing counsel (or
self-represented party) before 8:00 am on the day of the hearing.
The Court considers
the moving papers and response.
BACKGROUND
On June 9, 2025, Plaintiff Laura Spensley sued
Defendants Yaniv Ben Ami, individually and as Trustee of the Yaniv Ben Ami
Living Trust; Yaniv Ben Ami Living Trust; Keren Shabat; EG Renovation Inc. for:
(1) Breach of Express (Oral) Contract; (2) Fraud in the Inducement; (3)
Negligent and/or Reckless Breach of Duty, Breach of Covenant of Good Faith and
Fair Dealing; (4) Unjust Enrichment; (5) Conversion; (6) Quiet Title; (7)
Declaratory Relief; (8) Constructive Trust; (9) Punitive Damages; and (10)
Construction Defects.
On February 2, 2024, the Court entered default
against Defendants Yaniv Ben Ami, individually and as Trustee of the Yaniv Ben
Ami Living Trust, and Keren Shabat.
Defense counsel Jeffrey Nadel now moves for an
order relieving him as counsel for all Defendants.
ANALYSIS
The court may order that an attorney be changed
or substituted at any time before or after judgment or final determination upon
request by either client or attorney and after notice from one to the other.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 284(2).) “The determination whether to grant or deny a
motion to withdraw as counsel lies within the sound discretion of the trial
court.” (Manfredi & Levine v. Superior Court (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th
1128, 1133.)
An application to be relieved as counsel must be
made on Judicial Counsel Form MC-051 (Notice of Motion and Motion) (Cal. Rules
of Court, Rule 3.1362(a)), MC-052 (Declaration) (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule
3.1362(c)), and MC-053 (Proposed Order) (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362(e)).
The proposed order must specify all hearing dates scheduled in the action or
proceeding, including the date of trial, if known. (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule
3.1362(e).)
Counsel contends there has been a complete and
irreparable breakdown of the attorney-client relationship regarding trust,
communication, and agreement on strategy. Counsel also contends that elements
of the written Retainer Agreement have not been honored due to a series of
actions and non-actions between the attorney and client over the past couple of
months.
Counsel declares the moving papers have been
served on Defendants via mail at their last known address, which Counsel has
been unable to confirm after calling Defendants’ last known telephone
number(s). Counsel does not know of anyone in Thailand to assist with the
search and Ms. Shabat and Mr. Ami refuse to share their address in Thailand. Counsel’s
last contact by telephone was on March 27, 2025, which went to voicemail;
Counsel’s last email correspondence was March 28, 2025.
Plaintiff requests that granting the motions be conditioned
on Counsel’s providing Defendants Yaniv Ben Ami’s and Keren Shabat’s valid,
current home address to Plaintiff’s counsel; authorization to effect personal
service on these defendants via email or by text message; and monetary
sanctions in the amount of $3,500.00 against Defendant Yaniv Ben Ami for refusing
to cooperate with his counsel to properly respond to discovery.
Counsel has shown good cause to be relieved. The
Court will not condition relief as requested by Plaintiff. However, Counsel
failed to submit proposed orders including all the hearings scheduled in this
action as required under California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(e). Counsel
shall submit the proposed orders, also including all contact information for
Defendants that Counsel has, no later than May 19, 2024.
The motions are CONTINUED.