Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 23STCV13735, Date: 2023-12-01 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV13735 Hearing Date: February 16, 2024 Dept: 54
|
Superior Court
of California County of Los
Angeles |
|||
|
Geraldine S. Chuchian, |
Plaintiff, |
Case No.: |
23STCV13735 |
|
vs. |
|
Tentative Ruling |
|
|
Marie Alyse Simonian, et al., |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: February 16, 2024
Department 54, Judge Maurice A. Leiter
(6) Motions to Compel Responses to
Discovery
Moving Party: Plaintiff Geraldine S. Chuchian
Responding Party: None
T/R: PLAINTIFF’S
MOTIONS ARE GRANTED.
DEFENDANTS TO SERVE VERIFIED RESPONSES
TO THE SUBJECT DISCOVERY, WITHOUT OBJECTION, WITHIN 15 DAYS OF NOTICE OF
RULING.
PLAINTIFF’S REQUESTS FOR SANCTIONS ARE
GRANTED IN THE REDUCED AMOUNT OF $1,980.00 AGAINST EACH DEFENDANT, PAYABLE
WITHIN 30 DAYS.
PLAINTIFFS TO NOTICE.
If the parties wish to submit on the
tentative, please email the courtroom at SMCdept54@lacourt.org with notice to opposing counsel
(or self-represented party) before 8:00 am on the day of the hearing.
The Court considers the moving papers.
No opposition has been received.
“If a party to whom a demand for
inspection, copying, testing, or sampling is directed fails to serve a timely
response to it. . . [t]he party to whom
the demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling is directed waives any
objection to the demand, including one based on privilege or on the protection
for work product. . . . The party making
the demand may move for an order compelling response to the demand.” (CCP § 2031.300(a)–(b).) When timely
responses to interrogatories are not received, “[t]he party propounding the
interrogatories may move for an order compelling response to the
interrogatories.” (CCP § 2030.290(b).)
Plaintiff moves to compel responses
FIs, SIs and RPDs from Defendants Marie Alyse Simonian and Ruben Gabriel
Espinoza. Plaintiff served the discovery on November 3, 2023. After granting
Defendants’ requests for extensions, responses were due on January 8, 2024. As
of the date of these motions, Plaintiff has not received responses. Defendants
have not opposed this motion to show responses have been served. The motions
are GRANTED.
Plaintiff requests $2,460.00 in
sanctions for each of the six motions. The Court will allow $1,980.00 (3 hrs at
$600.00 per hour plus $60.00 filing fee for each motion) in total sanctions
against each Defendant.