Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 23STCV21702, Date: 2024-08-21 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV21702 Hearing Date: August 21, 2024 Dept: 54
|
Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles |
|||
|
Law Firm of Harold
Greenberg, |
Plaintiff, |
Case
No.: |
23STCV21702 |
|
vs. |
|
Tentative Ruling |
|
|
Barbara Appleberry
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
Defendants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: August
21, 2024
Department 54, Judge
Maurice A. Leiter
Motion to Set Aside Default
Moving Party: Plaintiff Law Firm
of Harold Greenberg
Responding Party: Defendant Barbara
Appleberry
T/R: DefenDANT’S
MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT IS GRANTED.
Defendant TO NOTICE.
If the parties wish
to submit on the tentative, please email the courtroom at¿SMCdept54@lacourt.org¿with notice to opposing counsel (or self-represented party)
before 8:30 am on the day of the hearing.
The Court
considers the moving papers, opposition, and reply.
Defendant Appleberry moves to set aside the default entered by the Court
on May 6, 2024, on grounds of both fraud and excusable neglect.
A motion under CCP § 473(b) must be made within six months of the
dismissal. Defendant’s motion is timely, as Default was entered on May 6, 2024,
and Defendant Appleberry brought this motion on June 14, 2024.
Defendant first contends that the default was entered as the result of
fraud. Defendant says she was not properly served and Defendant has produced a
false Declaration of Due Diligence. She moves to set aside default pursuant to
CCP § 473.5. Defendant has not shown fraud; her allegations are
unsubstantiated.
Defendant also moves for relief pursuant to CCP § 473(b), claiming that
she is 79 years old and experienced health challenges from which she
is still healing. She also claims she was confused, and believed that her
informal efforts to resolve the case would be sufficient. At the time Defendant was representing
herself and did appear in Court explaining that she was trying to speak with
Plaintiff to settle the case. The Court finds that this is sufficient to show
excusable neglect.
The motion is granted. Defendant shall file her response to the complaint
within 20 days.