Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: 24STCV29725, Date: 2025-06-03 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 24STCV29725    Hearing Date: June 3, 2025    Dept: 54

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

 

Juan Mata,

 

 

 

Plaintiffs,

 

Case No.:

 

 

24STCV29725

 

vs.

 

 

Tentative Ruling

 

 

E&R Construction, Inc.,

 

 

 

Defendants.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hearing Date: June 3, 2025

Department 54, Judge Maurice A. Leiter

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel

Moving Party: Brad Stuckey, counsel of record for Defendant E&R Construction, Inc.

Responding Party: None

 

T/R:      THE MOTION IS GRANTED. COUNSEL TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE OF ORDER ON DEFENDANT WITHIN 5 DAYS OF NOTICE OF RULING. COUNSEL WILL BE RELIEVED UPON FILING OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF ORDER.

 

COUNSEL TO NOTICE.

 

The Court considers the moving papers. No opposition has been received.

 

The Court may issue an order allowing an attorney to withdraw from representation, after notice to the client.  (CCP § 284.)  The attorney may withdraw from representation as long as the withdrawal would not result in undue prejudice to the client’s interest—i.e., counsel cannot withdraw at a critical point in the litigation.  (Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal. App. 4th 904, 915; see California Rule of Professional Conduct 3-700.)

 

Brad Stuckey, counsel of record for Defendant E&R Construction, Inc. seeks to withdraw from representation of Defendant. Counsel states that there has been a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship. Trial is set for June 29, 2026; no prejudice will result from counsel’s withdrawal. Counsel has complied with CRC 3.1362.

 

There is good cause for counsel’s withdrawal. The motion is GRANTED. 





Website by Triangulus