Judge: Maurice A. Leiter, Case: BC593886, Date: 2023-04-21 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: BC593886 Hearing Date: April 21, 2023 Dept: 54
|
Superior Court
of California County of Los
Angeles |
|||
|
City Investment Capital, Inc., |
Plaintiff, |
Case
No.: |
BC593886 |
|
vs. |
|
Tentative Ruling |
|
|
Hiroshi Ishimoto, |
Defendant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: April 21, 2023
Department 54, Judge Maurice A. Leiter
Motion to Amend Judgment
Moving Party: Plaintiff City Investment Capital,
Inc.
Responding Party: None
T/R: PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT IS GRANTED.
PLAINTIFF
TO NOTICE.
If
the parties wish to submit on the tentative, please email the courtroom at¿SMCdept54@lacourt.org¿with notice to opposing counsel (or self-represented
party) before 8:00 am on the day of the hearing.
The Court considers the moving papers. No opposition has been
received.
“To
prevail on a motion to add a judgment debtor, the judgment creditor generally
must show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that ‘(1) the parties to be
added as judgment debtors had control of the underlying litigation and were
virtually represented in that proceeding; (2) there is such a unity of interest
and ownership that the separate personalities of the entity and the owners no
longer exist; and (3) an inequitable result will follow if the acts are treated
as those of the entity alone.’ “ (Favila v. Pasquarella (2021) 65
Cal.App.5th 934, 280 Cal. Rptr. 3d 425, 437, quoting Relentless Air Racing,
LLC v. Airborne Turbine Ltd. Partnership (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 811, 815-6.)
On
January 23, 2017, Plaintiff obtained a default judgment against Defendant Hiroshi
Ishimoto. Plaintiff moves to amend the judgment to add Defendant’s aliases.
Plaintiff represents it learned of the aliases when it was contacted by the
Southwest Escrow Corporation, which was facilitating the sale of real property
owned by Defendant. The title search revealed that the property was owned by “Don
Bookstone, a married man as his sole and separate property, also known as Hiroshi
Ishimoto, also known as Hiroshi Dorry Ishimoto, also known as Dorry Ishimoto,
also known as Dori Ishimoto, also known as Dorry H. Ishimoto, also known as
Hiroshi Dorry Ishimoto, also known as Hiroshi D. Ishimoro, also known as
Hiroshi Matsumoto.”
Plaintiff has satisfied the
requirements to add a judgment debtor because the aliases are the same person
as Defendant. Defendant does not oppose the motion.
Plaintiff’s
motion is GRANTED.